- Joined
- Sep 20, 1998
- Messages
- 13,549
- Reaction score
- 21,520
- Age
- 54
Offline
So my flippant comment has really taken off lol. It was not meant to be taken literal, but I love the dialogue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
jesus what a pessimist, try looking on the positive side of thingsNope. There are better ways of fixing the underlying "problem.
First of all half is an arbitrary number. Earth might be able to go with 3.5 billion people, but other places may need more population (Asgard?)
And what about all the places he already took half from by the sword? They lose another half.
But forget all that. Let's just discuss Earth. Let's further assume that we're better off with 3.5 billion people. By indiscriminately wiping out half, you're killing a lot more than half. What about the deaths from drivers and pilots vanishing and dooming their passengers? Parents killed dooming their babies/pets. The resulting famine and chaos, the anarchy and looting.
It's a crap plan formulated by the lowest form of thinking.
Here's something better. Sterilize half the population. Same result (one generation away). Or sterilize everyone and people can petition for "undoing" it by demonstrating financial/mental competence. Look, it's not perfect, or even good, but anything short of compete eradication is better than a random half.
How about only half the people to compete with for crawfish. That price is going to drop big time.
Also means half the people harvesting them.half of all life. means half the crawfish too
Nope. There are better ways of fixing the underlying "problem.
First of all half is an arbitrary number. Earth might be able to go with 3.5 billion people, but other places may need more population (Asgard?)
And what about all the places he already took half from by the sword? They lose another half.
But forget all that. Let's just discuss Earth. Let's further assume that we're better off with 3.5 billion people. By indiscriminately wiping out half, you're killing a lot more than half. What about the deaths from drivers and pilots vanishing and dooming their passengers? Parents killed dooming their babies/pets. The resulting famine and chaos, the anarchy and looting.
It's a crap plan formulated by the lowest form of thinking.
Here's something better. Sterilize half the population. Same result (one generation away). Or sterilize everyone and people can petition for "undoing" it by demonstrating financial/mental competence. Look, it's not perfect, or even good, but anything short of compete eradication is better than a random half.
On the funny side, I'm seeing A TON of videos on how apparently none of the other actors like Brie Larson. In several interviews, there are major vibes going out.