Biggest Draft Bust Tournament (1 Viewer)

[Nevimeister]

No. 10 Charles Rogers (2003 2nd overall pick, Lions) vs.
No. 23 Johnathan Sullivan (2003 6th overall pick, Saints)

Just one of Matt Millen's many first-round bombs is Charles Rogers, who didn't last long in the league thanks to injuries and drug troubles. Never heard of Johnathan Sullivan? Don't feel bad. He had a whopping 1 1/2 sacks in three awful seasons.

Biggest Draft Bust Tournament - AOL Sports

AOL are having as the title suggests a tournament of biggest draft busts. Luckily for Sullivan he got matched up with a guy who should make it through a few rounds and be in the mix to the end

At the moment the voting is as follows:

Who was a worse pick?
Charles Rogers 69%
Johnathan Sullivan 31%

Total Votes: 2,087

 

[mark1]

sullivan was wayyyyyy worse

at least rogers had a good year before he got hurt. sullivan was just a sack and completely sucked from day one till the end

 

[BoNcHiE]

Sullivan was worse because of what we gave up to get him.

 

[Trey W.]

It's sad to see how many guys screwed up their career and lives from drugs.

 

[Colin311]

Rodgers is out due to injuries. Sullivan is out due to laziness.

Sullivan>Rodgers

 

[SaintAkira]

Vote Sully.

 

[mikaelaustin]

i can't believe Ki Jana Carter doesn't get a mention.

 

[canuckredux]

Sully was worse because he played for us. Both were just awful, but Rogers was chosen higher and that accounts for a lot.

 

[bigcobra]

rashan salaam

 

[canuckredux]

I don't think that Dayne should be on there. Sure, he hasn't lived up to his draft status, but he has played consistently since being drafted and has found a niche in Houston and played decently.

Couch's "bust" tag was not his fault. Injuries and playing on a dreadful team wouldn't make Peyton Manning look good, either.