They already have Chung on the team playing with an active drug charge against him and a player who was essentially banned from the game for multiple drug violations (a drug dealer and an addict as locker room mates. Bet that makes for some interesting hijinx...)The other thing we know, the patriots just bought a distraction for 10-15 million dollars
To be fair, we don't know if she reported it to the police - just because someone reports an alleged crime doesn't mean there is a prosecution.These women just want parting gifts, its a hustle, people cant possibly believe ALL these athletes are out here raping women or putting hands on women and these women don't want them to go to jail, but the are ok with cash consideration?
Your argument / point is absurd and completely out of context. This isn't a criminal lawsuit, but a civil one. And the "evidence" she has presented is nearly non-existent and non-convinicing. Add to that documented evidence of her seeking moneys and other financials from Brown, and she looks like [MOD EDIT: - SW].It seems that in your view, the accused is innocent until proven guilty, but the accuser is guilty until they prove their innocence. Do I have that right?
All of that might be correct, but judge at your own risk - there really isn't much in the way of evidence yet. She hasn't presented any evidence. Lawsuits aren't evidence, they only start the case. Answers to lawsuits aren't evidence either.Your argument / point is absurd and completely out of context. This isn't a criminal lawsuit, but a civil one. And the "evidence" she has presented is nearly non-existent and non-convinicing. Add to that documented evidence of her seeking moneys and other financials from Brown, and she looks like a gold digging whore.
If for instance, she reported anything to the police, went to the hospital, took pictures, or exhibited any kind of emotional express after the first or second assault, I might be taking a more skeptical view of AB's side. But her behavior appears to be very far from someone who was traumatized, assaulted, or raped. Her actions, her consent and effort to travel to places and place herself in his life, using her means to go to multiple states, don't sound like someone who underwent much trauma and has concern of putting herself in the same situation again. It looks very much like she was leech, trying to trade sexual favors for perks, investments, and whatever else she could garner from his celebrity.
Judging by the "evidence" that has been made public by both the accuser and the defendant - who is also an accuser in his counter suit (which would make her the defendent btw), and the FACT that this is a civil lawsuit and never went through a criminal proceeding, I'd say yeah, we are very entitled to discerning that she's the one who doesn't come close to meeting any kind of burden of proof and looks to be guilty and devious.