- Banned
- #166
Ihartsaints
Very Banned
Offline
Want me to keep going?
You can but if they are going to be Taysom haters like Bill M; don't bother.
Billy M @BillyM_91 Jan 17 "Lmao what a great play design and love that Jameis is the one who threw it. Taysom would have under thrown him"
Duce is fun to watch but was never a Taysom fan at least his bias is not overbearing. His flaw is that he expects Taysom to have the same understanding of the whole field as he does with the vantage of hindsight, overhead views, slowmo, and time to look at a play repeatedly. Every QB can be knocked with such microanalysis. Let's ask Duce to run Drew's last game or any of Jameis' 2019 losses through the same wringer and see what we get.
I love to run a little experiment. The NFL has a QB perspective camera view. I'd like to sit all the "Video Breakdown" gurus in front of a screen and start the playback in real-time as they break the huddle and blank the screen the instant the ball leaves the QB's hand. Then ask them to critique the play, Identify coverage, state who is open, and what play the QB should execute etc. Video replays make all of us into football geniuses.
He does make the correct observation that in the 4th game the playbook was much deeper. Unfortunately, he fails to acknowledge that Taysom had literally eight practices in pads with the first team before that game and probably only two that week with the expanded playbook.
Nowak is good but you widely mischaracterize his take on Taysom. From what I understand, he has a positive view of Taysom's chances.
Your last video is a joke. It ends with an appeal to get them past 1000
subscribers and offers no insight at all.
If someone's purpose is to get Taysom, in the one-sided world of Blogs, Tweets, and videos they can always fabricate a case. If your purpose is to believe Taysom is no good then I can understand why you choose to live in that echo chamber.
There is a reason trials are adversarial with a prosecutor and advocate.
Last edited: