Offline
Will take effect in 2023.
https://theathletic.com/1254001/201...r-pay-to-play-act-into-law-what-do-you-think/
https://theathletic.com/1254001/201...r-pay-to-play-act-into-law-what-do-you-think/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That's great and all, but that doesn't change the fact that if they do make money the NCAA is still going to declare them ineligible to participate in amateur sports.
Maybe. I'm far from able to predict how all this falls. There is a middle ground here somewhere. I certainly understand the arguments, but good things rarely come from 19 year old children with large sums of disposable income.And then the lawsuits will follow. There may be an anti-trust angle to this. I'd bet the courts will probably side with the NCAA though
Maybe. I'm far from able to predict how all this falls. There is a middle ground here somewhere. I certainly understand the arguments, but good things rarely come from 19 year old children with large sums of disposable income.
First of all, let's not exagerrate. No one is "putting their bodies on the line" here. Sure injuries can occur, just like everyone in every job. Risks certainly vary, but Suzy with the 4.0 who trips down a flight of stairs isn't getting the best medicine and rehab the school can afford. The schools will provide care for that. A kid playing four years of collegiate football, basketball, track, etc is not suffering irreparable harm to their bodies. That occurs in the professional leagues and college sports is but a small part of the cumulative effect.If those 19 year olds are putting their bodies on the line in very physical sports for those schools, then its nobody's business how much those 19 year olds have in their bank accounts. They put in the work. Plus the fact that most of the top recruits already get what they want under the table. Time to stop this foolishness.
Again, this doesn't any really change anything. California players can go ahead and sign endorsement deals with Mike, Gatorade, etc but as soon as they cash the check, the NCAA will rule them ineligible. Those schools will be forced to vacate their games.And these other states better get on board before USC/UCLA/Stanford etc has the greatest recruiting classes in the history of college sports in 2023.
First of all, let's not exagerrate. No one is "putting their bodies on the line" here. Sure injuries can occur, just like everyone in every job. Risks certainly vary, but Suzy with the 4.0 who trips down a flight of stairs isn't getting the best medicine and rehab the school can afford. The schools will provide care for that. A kid playing four years of collegiate football, basketball, track, etc is not suffering irreparable harm to their bodies. That occurs in the professional leagues and college sports is but a small part of the cumulative effect.
Make no mistake, this is about greed and money. This all has snowballed from when Ed O'Bannon's likeness was used without his permission because someone else got greedy. When money becomes the sole focus of sports
It's a ****ed up situation. I don't know the answer, but it's not start throwing money at 19 year old kids. That never solved any problem. There is a healthy medium somewhere. Perhaps they can max out what kids earn or put everything over $XXX.00 into a trust to be accessed later. I don't know, but unfettered access will ruin the sport the way it has ruined the NBA and NFL.
When you start broadcasting games nationally, it changes.So because the NCAA signs all the TV deals, where you thinking the money goes to? the president of the NCAA?? I am sure its divided out amongst all schools in the NCAA not some investors or board members.... regardless we start paying kids that play sports in school whats next High School PEE WEE.... this will ruin amateur sports....
Not sure what is greater with this question: the lack of intelligence or the lack of relevance.Did your kid play football in a p5 conference?
Not sure what is greater with this question: the lack of intelligence or the lack of relevance.