- Admin
- #31
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2002
- Messages
- 15,868
- Reaction score
- 10,416
Offline
It's magic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Universe Shouldn't Be Here, According to Higgs Physics
The universe shouldn't exist — at least according to a new theory.
Modeling of conditions soon after the Big Bang suggests the universe should have collapsed just microseconds after its explosive birth, the new study suggests.
"During the early universe, we expected cosmic inflation — this is a rapid expansion of the universe right after the Big Bang," said study co-author Robert Hogan, a doctoral candidate in physics at King's College in London. "This expansion causes lots of stuff to shake around, and if we shake it too much, we could go into this new energy space, which could cause the universe to collapse."
Sorry to bump this thread, I thought there was a more appropriate thread that I couldn't find. I found this story today, and I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Could anyone here smarter than me let me know what we should take from this?
Universe Shouldn't Be Here, According to Higgs Physics
If true, this sounds like we've just opened a whole new world of questions.
surprise ************!
This is why I can't count on Science to tell me everything I need to know. An overwhelming majority of science is based on hypothesis. Many times these hypothesis are proven wrong. Science creates more questions than answers, especially physics.
Even in this thread someone stated that a new discovery could change our ENTIRE understanding of space, time, and matter as we know it. Newsflash: We don't know crap. We just know what questions to ask.
It's magic.
Time is relative. If I were to advocate this hypothesis, I would say the universe is still expanding within a microsecond and will collapse at any moment.