Can You Names 14 Recievers better than Marques Colston??? (1 Viewer)

[Saint James]

Scouts Inc. can...

And don't worry about insider, is a free preview.

ESPN - Bounce-back season puts Moss on top - NFL

 

[Supertruck97]

Boldin and Marshall should be below him. And if we're talking about RECENT production (Not many years past) then Marvin Harrison should also be below him.

 

[yaygosaints]

That's ridonkulous.

 

[Supafroius]

Wow no love after two mind blowingly productive seasons.

 

[Tribune]

Yes, by copying their list, but swapping Housh up to 14 and dropping Brandon Marshall somewhere down the list. I think their list has merit, and hopefully a good player like Colston will be too busy proving he's closer to to the top of that list by his play, to care about one article.

Flame away, I'm homerproof!

 

[CargoJon]

Holt should be below him as well if we're strictly talking the last season or two. Also Johnson. Doesn't matter what his production "would have been", matters what it was.

Colston is top 10 IMO.

 

[Vega$$aint]

I can make a case for everybody on that list to be atleast on the same level or just a little higher then colston except roy williams. He just isn't consistant at all. Marshall would also be lower just because he has only done it for 1 year and colston has done it for 2 years.

eric

 

[Pickz]

I think Colston should be move up to at least 12

 

[Super Dad]

I think that they have a few old guys like Holt on the list out of respect above Colston.

 

[Saint James]

I'm thinking he's on the fringe of top 10. So i could probably name 10, based on current production (last 2 years or so), that's are legitimately better than him and contribute to their teams success as much as he does.

 

[Summed7]

Patten comes in at 56 and they say, "if it wasn't for injuries and lack of size he could have landed in the top half of the list" (top 32).

 

[gregh]

i dont have a problem with his ranking. anywhere from 5-20 is interchangable as far as talent. some of them had good years and some off years. hell, the whole list is interchangable...

 

[Saint-Ragnar]

If you believe this crotchedy old sports columnist for the Minneapolis Paper, Bernard Berrian should be on that list ahead of Colston, But no one up here in the Artic Circle actually gives any credence to "Grampa Sports"...

 

[SWJJ]

The list is reasonable, I would have ranked some higher and some lower, but I have no major objections...

marshall would be the closest to an objection...

 

[wbbigtymer]

Moss is no longer a sub-4.3 guy, but he can run sub-4.5.

^From the article.

Um, Randy Moss can run sub-4.5....ya think??? Understate much? I'm sure it's safe to say he can run a sub-4.4.

 

[bclemms]

I would actually rank Marshall and Colston higher on the list if including age and injuries.

Harrison was once a top 3 receiver but shouldn't be any where near the top 15. They talk about how much Burress improved last year but he only had 7 more catches for 40 more yards and 2 more TD's. It is amazing how much a Super Bowl makes individual players look better. He shouldn't be ahead of Colston. Almost any of them can be interchangeable.