Changes to playoff seeding? (1 Viewer)

Shadeaux

TheMatrix~Ak41/Mi22
Platinum VIP Contributor
Joined
Apr 30, 2002
Messages
9,099
Reaction score
11,631
Age
46
Location
yonder
Offline
I think it's an interesting proposition, I hate having games mean absolutely nothing & watching some team tank it with their 3rd stringers at the end of the season.
 

billinms

Tiptoeing Through the Tulips
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Subscribing Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
19,652
Reaction score
24,588
Age
46
Location
Ocean Springs
Offline
Sounds good to me. Might make the late season games more competitive.
 

atceagle

BRING THE WOOD!
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
1,523
Age
44
Location
Biloxi
Offline
Great idea, just wish it would have happened back when we were in the NFC West.
 

pancho

Superbowl by '08
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Age
46
Offline
In our weak division, I have a feeling that this could come back and bite us.
 

atceagle

BRING THE WOOD!
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
1,523
Age
44
Location
Biloxi
Offline
In our weak division, I have a feeling that this could come back and bite us.
I would think the opposite. That if you are in a weak division, it should be easier to win enough games to host.
 

Saintaholic

<><><><><><><><><><><>
Joined
Jul 8, 2000
Messages
15,498
Reaction score
24,840
Online
I am on the other side of the fence on this one. I think regardless of record, a division winner should be rewarded with a home playoff game. The road to the Super Bowl SHOULD be tough for a wild card team no matter how good of a record they have.
 

srenner

C-R-U-N-K.....
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,678
Reaction score
833
Age
39
Location
Loudoun County, VA
Offline
I am on the other side of the fence on this one. I think regardless of record, a division winner should be rewarded with a home playoff game. The road to the Super Bowl SHOULD be tough for a wild card team no matter how good of a record they have.
I'm with you on this one. Although I like the idea of adding value to the late season games I think it's important to reward division winners.
 

basilisk

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
3,015
Reaction score
584
Location
Ponchatoula
Offline
on the one hand it keeps (almost) all games important, right to the end... on the other hand, it semi-penalizes division winners (or at least the possibility exists)... i think on balance i'd vote 'yes'... why should, for example, jacksonville be penalized with no home game and an 11/5 record because indy is in their division while somebody like cleveland wins a weak division with a 9/7 record and can stay home?
 

msusaintsfan

All-Pro & Resident Ninja
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
4,891
Reaction score
3,076
Age
42
Location
Diamondhead, MS via Houston, Tx, via Starkville, M
Offline
I 'm with you basilisk all the way. I have never liked it just because a team wins their division that they automatically gets a home game in the wildcard round.

To play devil's advocate, who on here would be happy if we went 11-5 (say Carolina won the division) and somehow worked it's way out that we were a wildcard team and had to travel to play a 9-7 Seahawks team. Wouldn't seem right would it just because they won the West? I'm sure most of us would be up in arms.

I like the idea of making everyone of those games count and just because you win your division then you get a free pass. I guess I may be in the minority but it seems the teams with the better record should host games even if they didn't win their division.
 

Archie_4_HOF

Northshore Who Dat
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
2,426
Reaction score
964
Age
39
Location
Mandeville
Offline
However, if it was put to a vote, I'd vote no, and here's why: If there's a coach out there who saw the Colts and Bucs tank the end of this season, and saw the Giants put forth a gargantuan effort with nothing to play for in Week 17, and then saw what happened in the playoffs, and that coach is still dumb enough to be letting his players collect rust over the last two weeks of the season, then I'm opposed to the league stepping in and saving this coach from his own idiocy.

I am for this propostion but not this guys logic. Given what the Giants achieved, I believe less team s will rest players in the final game when they have nothing to gain. But that will only continue until a team plays all their starters and they lose a star in a meaningless game and the media rips them for playing their stars. These coaches can't win sometimes. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Imagine the Saints have nothing to gain in week 17 and employ the Giants strategy. Then Drew Brees gets knocked out for the season and lose in the playoffs to a wild card team. Then the media and fans will say hey Coach Payton how could you take the chance of playing Brees.
 

Saintaholic

<><><><><><><><><><><>
Joined
Jul 8, 2000
Messages
15,498
Reaction score
24,840
Online
To play devil's advocate, who on here would be happy if we went 11-5 (say Carolina won the division) and somehow worked it's way out that we were a wildcard team and had to travel to play a 9-7 Seahawks team. Wouldn't seem right would it just because they won the West? I'm sure most of us would be up in arms.
I wouldn't be up in arms. I think that if they won their division then they are entitled to a home playoff game. Its the way football has always been.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Similar threads




Saints Headlines (The Advocate)

Headlines

Top Bottom