- Joined
- Oct 2, 2016
- Messages
- 6,544
- Reaction score
- 12,240
Offline
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah, that'll teach 'em.They jumped up and stole Mahommes from us, and now we stole Peat from them! Take that Chiefs! ?
They jumped up and stole Mahommes from us, and now we stole Peat from them! Take that Chiefs! ?
It was a rePeat offense.They jumped up and stole Mahommes from us, and now we stole Peat from them! Take that Chiefs! ?
Well relatively speaking people saying he was garbage and probably not realistically he was mediocre, so I'd agree with you there.Been saying it forever on here. Peat is much better than people on here want to admit.
This desreves more of a spotlight..It was a rePeat offense.
Actually, he's at or around the average cash being thrown at FA tackles in 2020.Well relatively speaking people saying he was garbage and probably not realistically he was mediocre, so I'd agree with you there.
We just paid him as if he's a perennial Pro Bowler. He only had 1 Pro Bowl worthy season, 2018.
This isn’t for us to be concerned about. Our staff pretty much knows who they can keep or not. I don’t think they are doing this blindly. Like, oh no, now we can’t sign ...A lot of people, myself included, thought we might let Peat walk. I have no problem with having him back, but the contract he just got is shocking. Makes me wonder if it was a knee-jerk to keep him at all costs. I almost think the Chiefs should have had him vs the price we paid to keep him. He's an okay player, with his versatility adding to his value, but we just paid him like one of the best. We may potentially lose another good player because of this, and I think that's what is most concerning.
This isn’t for us to be concerned about. Our staff pretty much knows who they can keep or not. I don’t think they are doing this blindly. Like, oh no, now we can’t sign ...