Clinton to join Stein in challenging the election results. (1 Viewer)

SaintInBucLand

Veteran Starter
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Messages
928
Reaction score
957
Offline
This is the good news I was waiting to hear.

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Says It Will Participate In Wisconsin Recount | The Huffington Post

Hillary Clinton’s campaign on Saturday said that it would participate in a recount initiated by Green Party nominee Jill Stein in Wisconsin and said it would take similar action if a recount was initiated in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

The campaign has taken a number of steps since election day to review election results and has not found “any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology,” Marc Elias, the campaign’s general counsel, wrote in a statement on Medium. The campaign had not planned to call for a recount, Elias wrote, but now that one is underway, it felt an obligation to participate. The extent of the campaign’s participation was not immediately clear.
 

Domefan504

SR is my life!
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
15,027
Reaction score
13,022
Location
Metry/NOLA
Offline
May want to check Pennsylvania too. How could Clinton be way ahead then all of a sudden lose the lead. Something seems fishy. Michigan still not official.
 

Domefan504

SR is my life!
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
15,027
Reaction score
13,022
Location
Metry/NOLA
Offline
You all are so freaking pathetic. You precious snowflakes. Trump will be sworn in come January. Get over it. Stop crying. You all are pouting like children. It's embarrassing
Don't cry when you get booed at a Broadway musical, and the inauguration in January.
 

JimEverett

More than 15K posts served!
Joined
Mar 18, 2001
Messages
24,979
Reaction score
7,834
Offline
So all that talk about trump accepting the results of the election really doesn't apply to Clinton and Democrats? LMAO.

From the smarter side of the Democratic Party:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The amount of Democratic energy and money being wasted on recounts instead of trying to win the Louisiana Senate Race is mind boggling</p>&mdash; Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) <a href="https://twitter.com/danpfeiffer/status/801868100060659712">November 24, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

guidomerkinsrules

W H A T E V I R
VIP Contributor
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
62,982
Reaction score
104,660
Location
by the cemeteries
Online
So all that talk about trump accepting the results of the election really doesn't apply to Clinton and Democrats? LMAO.

From the smarter side of the Democratic Party:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The amount of Democratic energy and money being wasted on recounts instead of trying to win the Louisiana Senate Race is mind boggling</p>&mdash; Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) <a href="https://twitter.com/danpfeiffer/status/801868100060659712">November 24, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Bc being only 4 away from a majority is more important than the presidency?
Math is weird
 

brandon8283

Probably a drive-by
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
7,832
Reaction score
8,970
Age
37
Offline
You all are so freaking pathetic. You precious snowflakes. Trump will be sworn in come January. Get over it. Stop crying. You all are pouting like children. It's embarrassing


This isn't even about who won or lost. The Green Party doesn't have a real dog in this fight, as they will lose no matter what.

They just want to make sure the election wasn't hacked. In fact, I'd say their goal is to prove that it WAS legit. Honestly, I don't think there's going to be any realistic changes to the final result.

However, if by some strange twist of fate, there were something that changed the outcome, Clinton's group has to be on board, as they would be the beneficiaries.

Stop getting so offended, snowflake. You guys thought it was rigged until you won. Let's prove you were wrong then, or wrong now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

saintsfan26

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Mar 18, 2004
Messages
7,388
Reaction score
16,380
Age
43
Offline
Go ahead and recount it. You will probably find that Trump won by an even bigger margin. If there was any party that would cheat to win, it's the democrats. Just look at what they already did during the campaign. Everything from colluding with media to get debate questions in advance, to paying homeless people to cause chaos at Trump rallies. Why would they stop there?
 

DaveXA

I love the Lord!
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Sep 6, 2001
Messages
35,773
Reaction score
23,857
Age
50
Location
Vienna, VA via Lafayette
Offline
This is the good news I was waiting to hear.

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Says It Will Participate In Wisconsin Recount | The Huffington Post

Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign on Saturday said that it would participate in a recount initiated by Green Party nominee Jill Stein in Wisconsin and said it would take similar action if a recount was initiated in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

The campaign has taken a number of steps since election day to review election results and has not found &#8220;any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology,&#8221; Marc Elias, the campaign&#8217;s general counsel, wrote in a statement on Medium. The campaign had not planned to call for a recount, Elias wrote, but now that one is underway, it felt an obligation to participate. The extent of the campaign&#8217;s participation was not immediately clear.
I'm confused. The Clinton campaign has already "taken a number of steps to review election results and has not found 'any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.'" Yet they're still gonna participate in a recount? What am I missing here? :shrug:
 

jumpingoff

All-Pro
VIP Contributor
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
1,263
Reaction score
810
Offline
This isn't even about who won or lost. The Green Party doesn't have a real dog in this fight, as they will lose no matter what.

They just want to make sure the election wasn't hacked. In fact, I'd say their goal is to prove that it WAS legit. Honestly, I don't think there's going to be any realistic changes to the final result.
That's all I care about because at some point in the very near future this will be an issue and better to have a practice run now to do some forensics and maybe figure out some weak spots that need attention than having a major international **** storm when it does happen. Ounce of prevention....

I honestly don't care about anything else regarding a recount.
 

Galbreath34

Very Banned
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
32,273
Reaction score
30,813
Offline
I'm not for considering the election unsettled, but what kind of moron do you have to be to call checking a count with full time and openness rather than a one night machine count "cheating"?

That's like saying stores and police are corrupt and subverting justice when they check security cameras instead of just trusting eyewitness testimony. C'mon man.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

 

New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

 

Headlines

Top Bottom