bouxdag
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 495
- Reaction score
- 1,478
Offline
And when I posted that Pete said that the Saints would do a partial platooning if they got Burrow and if Brees came back, Brees had agreed to this, there was a large uproar, "Brees would never agree to that." Then 2 weeks later, SP announces that Taysom will take more snaps at QB and then Brees says he will support that.
At the time you claimed Brees agreed to "platoon" with Burrow, you claimed the Saints were giving up Kamara and potentially Michael Thomas to do so. That leaves Brees, in what is likely his last year, giving up his 2 best offensive weapons to come back and platoon with a rookie QB. Basically, Brees would be coming back to a team with no shot at the super bowl.
That is monumentally different than Brees giving up a few more snaps to Hill this year, while essentially rolling back the same exact team.
The fact you don't seem to understand the difference and present Brees agreeing to give more snaps to Hill as proof of something is exactly why I don't believe anything regarding Coach Pete threads.