- Moderator
- #46
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2002
- Messages
- 10,366
- Reaction score
- 4,299
- Age
- 52
Offline
Jesus Christ, Sunday cant come soon enough to stop this ignorant crap
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I understand what you are saying. If Brees was still hurt and hadn't already started a game, I agree the rest of the team would have brought their A-game, because they are well aware that Teddy ain't winning a game for them; but rather, just trying to not lose. With a healthy Brees, they aren't preparing or thinking that way. Even if Sean wanted to do some load management and sit Brees against a woeful opponent, I think you'd still get the same flat performance because "well if coach doesn't think we need Drew, this is gonna be easy" mindset creeps in.would the team have played better with Teddy? I’m pretty confident that they couldn’t have played worse. I don’t think that Teddywould have “sparked” the Saints...but they probably wound have played better if Teddy would have started.
When Teddy was the starter everyone played like every play mattered. The team came out with a good game plan and executed. Neither happened past week. This has always happened with Brees...the team has had letdown games...poor game planning, poor focus, poor execution. I think that the team knows that it can’t afford to be complacent with Teddy.
haha. Missed your post before I posted mine above.Thanks Coach Pete, but if this was the Falcons Super Bowl, shouldn't we have staged a massive comeback and won the game!
Thing is, Brees had nothing to do with this loss. Not sure what he was supposed to do when he wasn't being guarded long enough to make plays. He couldn't go out there and play defense neither.
32-45 with 287 yards. No INT's. We had no run game. I don't get it.
Facepalm emote for Coach Pete on this one.
Has Pete been hitting the bottle after the loss?I hear you loud and clear. Personally, I never even thought once about benching Brees for Teddy so it was a shock to me today when Coach Pete said that.
One of my first thoughts after seeing the disparity of 45 pass/11 rush attempts was how many times did Drew audible from run to pass. Not suggesting Drew is at fault for anything but the thought did cross my mind. It was just a big swing from what was the norm for the last month or so.11 rush attempts and 45 pass attempts was the reason why the Saints had no run game.
Failing to establish a running game not only put the Oline in position to fail but it also put the defense in a bad spot as well.
I wouldn't be too quick to say that Brees had nothing to do with the loss because he has the freedom to change any play at the line of scrimmage and we don't know how many times he checked out of running plays and threw the ball.
Its always happened with Brees but that doesn’t mean it happen because of Brees. Its just a matter if math. Look at the sample size you have with Bridgewater V Brees. Brees has played 225 games so with a sample size that big, of course you’ll find some clunkers and I bet I can find a dozen or so clunkers by NE over the past decade too but when given the option to go with Jimmy Goropolo, who didn’t have any clunkers with NE, they went with the guy that had a dozen clunkers on his resume.When Teddy was the starter everyone played like every play mattered. The team came out with a good game plan and executed. Neither happened past week. This has always happened with Brees...the team has had letdown games...poor game planning, poor focus, poor execution. I think that the team knows that it can’t afford to be complacent with Teddy.
True. I like this list. There is also the 5 INT game against the Falcons. Brees was not horrible but was to blame for 2-3 of the sacks by missing open WR's and holding on to the ball too long and not being able to extend plays. But Brees did not lose the game. The team did (minus MT, TH, ML, Harris and Lutz)Agreed.
That's why I haven't participated in the "we need a #2 WR ASAP"...……."we're not as good as we thought"...……."time to lower expectations" blah blah blah nonsense.
Show me an above-average or great Payton-era Saints team and I can show you a flat / mediocre game:
2006 - Redskins (which isn't even counting some of those AFC North games earlier in the year)
2009 - Cowboys and Bucs, back to back.
2010 - Cardinals...Browns
2011 - Bucs...Rams
2013 - Jets...Rams
2017 - 0-2 start / Falcons on TNF
2018 - Dallas
I think Coach Pete is dead wrong about the QB situation. Brees was clearly determined to come back as soon as he could, I think that is a good indication that he will play next year. I like Bridgewater but I really think he will be a starting QB elsewhere this season....
The Ravens and Jackson are riding high right now but IMO it is only a matter of time before he gets injured if they continue to expose him in the running game 10-15 times a game....