Offline
The way Guice plays reminds me of Steve Smith Sr, minus the punching of team mates and spitting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Cook is a better blocker and a better route runner, but those are both things that can be learned. He reminds me a bit of CJ Spiller at Clemson. He's not going to break many tackles, but he's a patient runner who will explode when he gets a crease. He has improved his ball security. As for hands, Cook catches the ball cleanly. Compared to Fournette, I'd put Fournette's hands up with anyone's in College Football. He is quite simply naturally good at everything. He could have been a top five player in this draft at multiple positions, including LBer.I agree, but as an FSU fan and someone who's watched both, when someone says "Fournette has the speed edge" I'm going to point out exactly what you two just reiterated.
Cook is a better blocker and better receiver. I'd say Fournette has a power edge and either would be great to have in the NFL.
The way Guice plays reminds me of Steve Smith Sr, minus the punching of team mates and spitting.
This is a statement that will get under the skin of many on this board due to the homerism, which I get. But it has to be getting difficult even for LSU fans to claim LF as better than Cook. Dalvin is a more explosive runner, a better pass catcher out of the backfield, and has shown better vision between the tackles.
Plus one guy is playing his heart out in the bowl game for his school, the other is sitting out to stay healthy. I just think it's gotta be almost a unanimous opinion at this point amongst scouts. Both are great prospects, but Cook is better. I love comparisons, Cook would be Jamaal Charles, to Leonard's Darren McFadden.