Danny Clark IN the Red Zone (1 Viewer)

tjschouest

Guest
Joined
May 14, 2002
Messages
142
Reaction score
32
Age
60
Location
Terrytown, Louisiana....baby!!!!
Offline
Did anyone else notice Danny Clark's play in the red zone yesterday? He was awesome! Not only did he make several tackles BEHIND the line of scrimmage, but he once had to cover Crumpler and stuck to him like glue, which caused a sack of Vick.

It was great seeing that we had a Sam Mills type linebacker in there in the short red zone again.
 

TPS

Guest
Joined
Aug 15, 2000
Messages
36,028
Reaction score
56
Age
57
Location
da boyah
Offline
Yes. I represented on a thread yesterday. Go Danny Clark.

:rock:

TPS
 

Frank The Rat

Official SR twitter team
VIP Contributor
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
22,860
Reaction score
7,820
Age
43
Location
Albany, LA
Offline
He usually plays that way when he is in. Kinda makes me wonder why he doesn't play more then just in goaline situations.
 

peglegpeet13

23-3 What a Night!!!
VIP Contributor
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
5,212
Reaction score
1,222
Age
41
Location
Kenner
Offline
I saw that, he looked good in those situations.
 

LSSpam

Practice Squad
Joined
Jun 2, 2002
Messages
28,419
Reaction score
8,141
Age
39
Location
Oxford, MS
Offline
He usually plays that way when he is in. Kinda makes me wonder why he doesn't play more then just in goaline situations.

Because goaline situations is where he looks that good :) He's situational for our defense. Very good, great inside run stuffer. Liability in coverage, not anymore sideline-to-sideline then Simoneau
 

RgnKjnDroid

Very Banned
Joined
Aug 8, 1997
Messages
5,426
Reaction score
27
Offline
Shame he's not better in coverage 'cause he's clearly a beast against the inside run.
 

homertone

All-Pro
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
592
Offline
It seems like there’s been a couple other games in which he came up with some big plays in the red zone. When I saw that big tackle yesterday, I immediately thought “Let me guess.. Danny Clark.” And sure enough…
 

dankdouglas

Towel Guy
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
900
Reaction score
364
Age
45
Location
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Offline
Om the fourth and 1 where Dunn scored I noticed Simoneau on his back in the endzone where was Danny? He was in there for the previous 2 or 3 plays.
 

Burtifus

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Jul 8, 2001
Messages
3,472
Reaction score
409
Age
42
Location
Lakeview
Offline
I haven't seen Simoneaux make enough plays in run defense, blitzing or coverage to justify not seeing Danny Clark in the starting spot but obviously I'll defer to the coaching staff that's got us to 7-4.
 

syracuse saint

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Contributor
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,590
Reaction score
2,963
Age
54
Offline
Didn't Clark actually have 2 stops inside the 5 yard line?
 

swivel

Guest
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Offline
Om the fourth and 1 where Dunn scored I noticed Simoneau on his back in the endzone where was Danny? He was in there for the previous 2 or 3 plays.

I noticed that too. they pulled Clark and put in Simoneau. must have been thinking it was a passing down.

I for one don't understand this liability in coverage crud. Clark has been great in coverage on goaline situations, always picking up his man. Plus he actually makes tackles.

On the other hand, Simoneau, well he probably has less tackles than Clark, yet he has played in about 30 times more plays than Clark. Your middle linebacker should be making more than 2-3 tackles per game.
 

truck man

not so ******
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
5,935
Reaction score
1,372
Age
41
Offline
Because goaline situations is where he looks that good :) He's situational for our defense. Very good, great inside run stuffer. Liability in coverage, not anymore sideline-to-sideline then Simoneau

never had problems with the Raiders in coverage. he was deemed an every down LBer. he just was phased out because of his cap number and the youth movement on their defense. none of you have seen the guy cover this year, yet you make these statements. remember what they said about Colston he wasn't fast enough to get seperation and was a tweener, well he showed them. IMO it has more to do with the knowledge of the playbook or lack there of.
 

LSSpam

Practice Squad
Joined
Jun 2, 2002
Messages
28,419
Reaction score
8,141
Age
39
Location
Oxford, MS
Offline
never had problems with the Raiders in coverage. he was deemed an every down LBer. he just was phased out because of his cap number and the youth movement on their defense. none of you have seen the guy cover this year, yet you make these statements. remember what they said about Colston he wasn't fast enough to get seperation and was a tweener, well he showed them. IMO it has more to do with the knowledge of the playbook or lack there of.


The Raiders release had absoloutely nothing to due with youth or contract since Danny Clark is neither particularly old nor was the final year on his 3 year - 3 million dollar contract particularly expensive. He was released because they moved Kirk Morrison inside, making room for Sam Williams. Clark was then released and the Saints picked him up at near the NFL vet-minimum.

Danny Clark sat on the bench in Nickel and Dime situations with the Raiders suggesting he was a liability in pass coverage.
 

Saint Droopy

Born/Raised in Hollygrove
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
26,825
Reaction score
20,016
Location
Reppin' N.O. here in DFW
Offline
OK... the guy was a liability in coverage yet he was a 100 tackle guy. I say give him a shot... he may just get his shot next week because Sim has a hand problem that he needed to see a specialist for. I just saw Payton's press and he opened with the injuries.

Back to Clark... who exactly said he was bad in coverage? All I know is that the guy finds the ball and makes the takle... is that not what a MLB is paid to do? As far as his problems in coverage... lets see...
 

truck man

not so ******
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
5,935
Reaction score
1,372
Age
41
Offline
The Raiders release had absoloutely nothing to due with youth or contract since Danny Clark is neither particularly old nor was the final year on his 3 year - 3 million dollar contract particularly expensive. He was released because they moved Kirk Morrison inside, making room for Sam Williams. Clark was then released and the Saints picked him up at near the NFL vet-minimum.

Danny Clark sat on the bench in Nickel and Dime situations with the Raiders suggesting he was a liability in pass coverage.

he also played 76 % percent of the radiers defensive plays the past 2 years, but he never played in anickle situation???? i can see dime, but he defintely played in the nickel. there is no way he played that much and wasn't on the field in nickel situations
 

BoNcHiE

Every team's Elixor
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
57,962
Reaction score
74,242
Offline
I'm open to him getting more time. Change can be a good thing (brooks taught me that). If he gets burnt, well sit him down. Can't hurt to try him at the beginning of the game on 1st and 2nd downs when we are not in nickel and dime situations.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

 

New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

 

Headlines

Top Bottom