<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NeZv8AEv0uQ&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NeZv8AEv0uQ&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
I think this is a fair argument, since ideologically pure republicans seem to strong support the rights of money, ownership, and private property while seemingly ignoring any amount of compassion. The republicans primary objective in the health-care debate is protecting the property rights of insurance companies because they believe a public option will reduce private insurance companies profit margins. Is this not a fair assessment?
I think this is a fair argument, since ideologically pure republicans seem to strong support the rights of money, ownership, and private property while seemingly ignoring any amount of compassion. The republicans primary objective in the health-care debate is protecting the property rights of insurance companies because they believe a public option will reduce private insurance companies profit margins. Is this not a fair assessment?