TechDawg09
Hall-of-Famer
Offline
"Hands up, don't flag"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I I think the risk is too great - if a solid package of evidence ever came out on that, it would be like steroids in baseball. There would be hearings at Congress and faith in the competition element of the game would be gone . . . and so with it would go the game. They would be killing the golden goose.
hands up, don't flag.
I get the appeal of that line of thought. I can't say it's wrong and you're at least presenting it in a fair way that isn't entirely cynical like many do.
I just don't buy it. I don't think the league provides parameters or objectives for refs to call games that are based on anything other than the football that's played (e.g. sometimes they emphasize certain rules or have mid-season reminders about certain things). I can't accept that officials are out there thinking about making sure there's a tight playoff picture or parity or any kind of concern like that.
I recognize that I'm probably being naive. I recognize that I don't buy it because I don't want to believe it. I think the risk is too great - if a solid package of evidence ever came out on that, it would be like steroids in baseball (but worse). There would be hearings at Congress and faith in the competition element of the game would be gone . . . and so with it would go the game. They would be killing the golden goose.
I recognize that there is a lot of money involved. I recognize that revenue sharing and parity are important. But they get most of that from the salary cap and an orderly method of talent distribution (draft, waiver system, practice squad, etc.). Once you start giving officials parameters for results, the game is lost IMO. But again, my wife tells me all the time that I have too much faith in people.
0% chance Seattle would have tried the extra point.My guess is that they would have kicked the XP taking into consideration that points come into the tie breaking method . but then again the fear of it being blocked and returned for 2 pts could have made them not
Does anyone have a screen shot showing Kearse's feet? It was extremely close - his right foot was in bounds because it hit the pylon.
Hitting the pylon doesn't make him in bounds, he still needs to land in bounds after possessing the ball.
The reason hitting the pylon with the ball (if possession has already been established) is used to determine a TD, is because in order for the ball to touch the pylon it has to break the plane of the goal line.
I swear that's JenkinsI think this sums up everyone's feelings at that moment
0% chance Seattle would have tried the extra point.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
what's up with "Hear no Evil" in the lower right?