- Joined
- Jan 22, 2000
- Messages
- 56,866
- Reaction score
- 53,962
Offline
I couldn't help but to think back on the times this season the Saints have played less than stellar football. The term 'winning ugly' has been used a few times this year particularly when there has been some specific areas of weakness (or outright failures). For example, the Saints got rattled pretty good by the Falcons in our first game with them in the Superdome. Drew Brees was on the carpet more than Stanley Steemer in that game. Yet in our second match the roles were completely reversed.
It's hard not to conclude that sometimes the coaches (who are basically teaching the same fundamentals all the time) are not able to get the players' attention to focus on their assignments. Often when the team fails in one area, we see a complete turnaround the next time they are faced with the same situation in a game. Do the players learn their assignments better after having faced some adversity?
I mention this because I tend to get a little more anxious about our team whenever it's nothing but 'smooth sailing' for stretch of the season. Many have brought up in the past about the issue we sometimes have of 'playing down to the competition'. Is it just human nature or do the players really need some setbacks to help them focus in on the job at hand?
The onside kicks debacle last Thursday night seems to be another case in point. There is a part of me that is so glad that we failed so miserably against those desperation attempts by Atlanta. Will the special teams handle that situation better the next time they are faced with an onside kick attempt?
I never had a chance to play organized football and I'm not quite sure how coaches and players respond to the need to make adjustments to the glaring mistakes that happen on the field from time to time. But it does make me wonder if the players actually perform better after such failures than if the mistakes had never happened in the first place. Obviously coaching is teaching. Do the failures create the best situations to help the team learn & play their best?
It's hard not to conclude that sometimes the coaches (who are basically teaching the same fundamentals all the time) are not able to get the players' attention to focus on their assignments. Often when the team fails in one area, we see a complete turnaround the next time they are faced with the same situation in a game. Do the players learn their assignments better after having faced some adversity?
I mention this because I tend to get a little more anxious about our team whenever it's nothing but 'smooth sailing' for stretch of the season. Many have brought up in the past about the issue we sometimes have of 'playing down to the competition'. Is it just human nature or do the players really need some setbacks to help them focus in on the job at hand?
The onside kicks debacle last Thursday night seems to be another case in point. There is a part of me that is so glad that we failed so miserably against those desperation attempts by Atlanta. Will the special teams handle that situation better the next time they are faced with an onside kick attempt?
I never had a chance to play organized football and I'm not quite sure how coaches and players respond to the need to make adjustments to the glaring mistakes that happen on the field from time to time. But it does make me wonder if the players actually perform better after such failures than if the mistakes had never happened in the first place. Obviously coaching is teaching. Do the failures create the best situations to help the team learn & play their best?