Drafting a QB in the first does nothing to win a SB now (1 Viewer)

SaintsBrah

Pro-Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
998
Reaction score
1,886
Offline
Drafting a QB early is somewhat giving up on “one last run”.

We will be hurting “post Brees” regardless.

Anything other than a player who can contribute now is pointless. Unless you prefer to finish 6-10 instead of 4-12 the year after Brees retires
 
Wasting another first round pick on moving up to get an unproven Davenport (you paid for pie in the sky potential) didn't get us a Super Bowl either.
So the worst call in NFC Championship history, and he being injured and not participating in the Vikings playoff game is your parameter?
 
True, Davenport has flashed but has not justified what we gave up
Correct, in fact not even close.

He essentially was a top 6/7 pick for what we gave up. He needs to turn into Von Miller to justify what we gave up for him.
 
It doesn't....Especially when the Saints plan to use Taysom Hill as a band-aid temporarily next year until the following year when they go all in on Deshaun Watson who I doubt will be franchised again for another year. Or, give up the farm in a trade for Watson next year.
 
Drafting a QB early is somewhat giving up on “one last run”.

We will be hurting “post Brees” regardless.

Anything other than a player who can contribute now is pointless. Unless you prefer to finish 6-10 instead of 4-12 the year after Brees retires
This is wrong. If you get a starter at QB you get him. Many positions drafted at #24 don’t make an impact right away.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom