Drew Brees is greedy, cares more about $ than winning (I was so wrong about that, thread) (1 Viewer)

zigzag

All-Pro
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
883
Offline
He has the most team friendly contract in the NFL. Basically signed a 1 year guaranteed with a team option for 4 extra years. Every other QB not named Fitzpatrick and 90% of the NFL contracts guarantee franchise tag plus half of their salary for the second season.

7 years 175 million with 50 million Guaranteed would've still been a fair contract. It's still only a guarantee of average salary for 2 years, and the team can ask him to take a pay cut or release him without owing him anything the third year.

The media led everyone to believe he was asking for at least 60 million, and felt he deserved it.

I was wrong about him putting money over winning and questioning his values .Drew can come to my house and punch me 44 million times in the face. i deserve it.

If Drew was willing all this time to sign for 44 million guaranteed Benson should fire Loomis after the 1st game. Putting the greatest player in franchise history through the media scrutiny and causing fans to turn on Brees for asking for them to pay him what he would have been owed without an extension. Brees is the only QB that hasn't received an extension with 2 years left after they won a super bowl. he's had it happen twice.

Starting to believe we are one of the worst organizations at taking care of star players. Fans have felt Nicks,Graham, and Brees were greedy, but if they were signed to an extension with 2 years left like other teams their negotiations wouldn't have played out in the media.
 

Rugger

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
VIP Subscribing Member
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Messages
16,243
Reaction score
9,500
Age
39
Location
Las Vegas
Offline
I'm very interested in seeing who actually owns up and posts in this thread.
 

MSUSousaphone

Owning the CONCACAF
VIP Contributor
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
15,881
Reaction score
6,239
Age
37
Location
Lake Charles
Offline


Lol. Just playing.

But as I was reading the thread title, I thought some troll really was ragging on Brees. Had the popcorn halfway cooked before I realized what the thread was really about.
 

P'cola WhoDat

Veteran Starter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
294
Reaction score
419
Location
Pensacola
Offline
I never once thought he was greedy and don't know why anyone would think that. It's always been obvious he loves the town, the fans and the team and his actions show he is an outstanding human being. All we have heard up until the deal was done was nothing but gossip. The real reason our financial situation was terrible is because we invested to much in people who don't deserve to carry Drew's jockstrap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

nolaswede

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
3,399
Reaction score
3,692
Offline
Good point and was really hoping that he wouldn't break the bank. Tough not to love the guy - definitely a bromance, he just haven't met me yet!
 

Zztop

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
5,308
Reaction score
7,343
Offline
Starting to believe we are one of the worst organizations at taking care of star players. Fans have felt Nicks,Graham, and Brees were greedy, but if they were signed to an extension with 2 years left like other teams their negotiations wouldn't have played out in the media.
Loomis dragged his feet on the prior contract for so long that they lost Nicks to FA. Losing Nicks started the wheels in motion. What you see today, the team needing 2 new guards (I anticipate AP switching to RT next year) can be traced back to that point in time.
 

wnelson

Who Dat Nation
VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
11,492
Reaction score
9,028
Age
41
Location
metry brah
Offline
I was prepared to lose him. I have defended and attacked him and am happily surprised he has such a team friendly contract.
 
OP
zigzag

zigzag

All-Pro
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
883
Offline
he has the most team friendly contract in the NFL. Basically signed a 1 year guaranteed with a team option for 4 extra years. Every other QB not named fitzpatrick and 90% of the NFL contracts guarantee franchise tag plus half of their salary for the second season.

7 years 175 million with 50 million Guaranteed would've still been a fair contract. It's still only a guarantee of average salary for 2 years, and the team can ask him to take a pay cut or release him without owing him anything the third year.

the media led everyone to believe he was asking for at least 60 million, and felt he deserved it.

i was wrong about him putting money over winning and questioning his values .Drew can come to my house and punch me 44 million times in the face. i deserve it.



If Drew was willing all this time to sign for 44 million guaranteed Benson should fire Loomis after the 1st game. Putting the greatest player in franchise history through the media scrutiny and causing fans to turn on Brees for asking for them to pay him what he would have been owed without an extension. Brees is the only QB that hasn't received an extension with 2 years left after they won a super bowl. he's had it happen twice.

Starting to believe we are one of the worst organizations at taking care of star players. Fans have felt Nicks,Graham, and Brees were greedy, but if they were signed to an extension with 2 years left like other teams their negotiations wouldn't have played out in the media.

Just read the actual structure of the contract, wasn't aware it was only a one year.. extension . 25 million is still better than 43 million. No more franchise tag should help negotiations next time. Unfortunately there's going to be a next time. When they announced it earlier it sounded so much better. Would have been more relieving to know he was under contract until he was done playing.
 

WCoastSaintsFan

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
1,999
Reaction score
2,484
Location
Hayward, CA
Offline
I don't think I ever referred to the man as as greedy. He should get what he can, I was just not wanting to leave the team in bad shape with crazy cap numbers or dead money once he's done. More to do with what Loomis was willing to give than what Drew wanted to get. This contract works out great for us and puts another 24 million in Drew's pocket. I hope both sides are satisfied.
 

0rion

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
7,584
Reaction score
12,627
Location
Central Ohio
Offline
I would've been happy with the 4 year $100M number I saw in another thread. Drew definitely gave the hometown discount. I personally wish the contract was a little longer because we'll just be going through the same speculation after next season. He's got more than 1-2 years left in him.
 

blackngoldmike

DTR
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
1,598
Age
38
Location
New Bern, NC via Venice, LA
Offline
Loomis dragged his feet on the prior contract for so long that they lost Nicks to FA. Losing Nicks started the wheels in motion. What you see today, the team needing 2 new guards (I anticipate AP switching to RT next year) can be traced back to that point in time.
Nicks' career was over the second he left New Orleans! Signing Grubbs to replace a player who was not going to continue in this league is the bigger issue.
 

obwhiteo

Proudly wearing my dress!
VIP Contributor
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
5,904
Reaction score
2,737
Age
39
Location
Gulfport
Offline
He has the most team friendly contract in the NFL. Basically signed a 1 year guaranteed with a team option for 4 extra years. Every other QB not named Fitzpatrick and 90% of the NFL contracts guarantee franchise tag plus half of their salary for the second season.

7 years 175 million with 50 million Guaranteed would've still been a fair contract. It's still only a guarantee of average salary for 2 years, and the team can ask him to take a pay cut or release him without owing him anything the third year.

The media led everyone to believe he was asking for at least 60 million, and felt he deserved it.

I was wrong about him putting money over winning and questioning his values .Drew can come to my house and punch me 44 million times in the face. i deserve it.

If Drew was willing all this time to sign for 44 million guaranteed Benson should fire Loomis after the 1st game. Putting the greatest player in franchise history through the media scrutiny and causing fans to turn on Brees for asking for them to pay him what he would have been owed without an extension. Brees is the only QB that hasn't received an extension with 2 years left after they won a super bowl. he's had it happen twice.

Starting to believe we are one of the worst organizations at taking care of star players. Fans have felt Nicks,Graham, and Brees were greedy, but if they were signed to an extension with 2 years left like other teams their negotiations wouldn't have played out in the media.

Couple things here are incorrect though. It's not a 4 year option for the team. It's a one year extension that cost the team for 5 years. Drew is actually getting just as much money as the rumored contracts, it's just spread out more for the team, and more up front for him. It's not a team friendly contract, as much as it was a way for us to afford the extra year. If drew play lights out the this year, we are having the same conversation next offseason expect we won't be able to extend him because we will still be paying for this contract.

But regardless, we have drew for two more seasons and some cap space. I'm happy.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Similar threads



New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

Headlines

Top Bottom