Ed Reed Or Charles Woodson? (1 Viewer)

[SaintBrad]

Both.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Eman5805]

Reed needs to come on home.

 

[outvoted]

While I like Reed and his instincts, my concern with both is injuries. If we are going to go after older players, regardless of their performance history, we need to really concentrate on their injury history.
We want them to come in and make the team better the entire year, not just for a few weeks here and there, right?
Not saying that injuries will happen, and both of them are beasts who make offenses account for them, however it is a financial, health, and production equation... I'll leave that kind of stuff to Loomis

 

[stevemadden]

Ed Reed, he's still playing at a high level.

 

[Professor]

Both.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

My idea is like your, but different:

Neither.

Aging vets are not the answer.

 

[409forever]

i love reeds playmaking ability.we need more turnovers.however woodson could play nickel corner too. so both.

 

[TCUDan]

All things equal, of course Ed Reed.

But if you get Woodson for a discount similar to how we got Darren Sharper (unlikely, but who knows?), that would be a great pickup.

 

[LetsGetWaffles]

My idea is like your, but different:

Neither.

Aging vets are not the answer.

Darren Sharper disagrees w you. While I agree w you that they don't fix anything long term, a few (not all) do fix things short term. If I need stitches for a cut but all I have to choose between is nothing or a bandaid to cover the cut, I choose a bandaid.

 

[SweetT]

Both.

 

[keefresh2]

Need for Reed: Most Wanted

 

[sammymvpknight]

Either would be a blessing. No need to be picky.

 

[strandedsaint]

Reed 1st...then woodson but heck i'd take anybody that will make us better

 

[SoggyBottomBoy]

Edward.

 

[TheSaints7]

Easily Ed Reed.

 

[TurboWhoDat]

i've read some things that indicate that bmore is interested in keeping reed. supplemental question, if reed isn't available, would you take woodson?