IntenseSaint
Powhatan Power
Offline
I'm curious what people think.
If income was the same from self employment or working for another business.
If income was the same from self employment or working for another business.
That is sooo easy.
Working for another business. When you are off you are off. So much less stress and responsibility.
What is the point of assuming all the risk and the million little stressful headaches if the reward is no greater than working for someone else?
I'm curious what people think.
If income was the same from self employment or working for another business.
That is sooo easy.
Working for another business. When you are off you are off. So much less stress and responsibility.
What is the point of assuming all the risk and the million little stressful headaches if the reward is no greater than working for someone else?
Totally depends on the business.
From a tax standpoint I did much better self-employed 15-20 years ago but I believe some of those loopholes have been closed, such as home-office deductions. I wound up paying a 14-percent overall tax rate on an income (reportedAre you talking about the pure numbers or the overall life questions?
I think the SE tax is supposed to make it comparable, but as an employee you don't have to manage your own benefits (insurance, 401-K, etc.) - so I would think that if the dollars are purely equal, it would be better to be someone's employee.
Of course, there are other issues. (Making your schedule and working conditions, upside on profit for more work, etc.)
From a tax standpoint I did much better self-employed 15-20 years ago but I believe some of those loopholes have been closed, such as home-office deductions. I wound up paying a 14-percent overall tax rate on an income (reported) of about 38K in 1994-5. I also liked the freedom of working from home, but I found my boss was still an idiot at times
![]()