- Moderator
- #61
Online
In my opinion, this was always a non-story.
Oh I agree. This was probably a case of not enough information to make a determination. We know a lot more now than we did several weeks ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In my opinion, this was always a non-story.
So let me gets right ? Saints were brought into this so court can say church was more worried about pr than scandal? So besides gale and bensel doing too much with pr there is much to see here in regards to saints?In my opinion, this was always a non-story.
I have no clue what you’re asking.So let me gets right ? Saints were brought into this so court can say church was more worried about pr than scandal? So besides gale and bensel doing too much with pr there is much to see here in regards to saints?
What a bunch of lawyer BS, trying to get their hands on saints wealth.
A former Orleans Parish Civil District Court judge on Thursday heard arguments for and against publicly releasing a trove of emails between New Orleans Saints executives and the Archdiocese of New Orleans as the local Catholic Church sought to manage fallout from its ongoing clergy sex abuse scandal.
Carolyn Gill-Jefferson said she would not immediately rule on whether to remove a court seal keeping the emails confidential. Instead, she said she would issue a recommendation on the matter to Civil District Court Judge Ellen Hazeur, who is presiding over the lawsuit which led to Thursday's hearing.
And if there weren't a profit motive, I doubt even the plaintiff's attorneys would trouble themselves with this case.
True ... just making the point there has to be a strong outside incentive for a New Orleans mover-&-shaker (i.e. a major local law firm) to come near this fiasco. Just weird watching the local judiciary play "Hot Potato" with this particular side issue.You could say that about 99.999% of lawsuits.