Beast
Former Camp Beast
Offline
I think this is something we all suspected, but the fact that he was never listed as anything less than 100% for the playoffs should cause concern within the league.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...eys-knee-was-more-hurt-than-initially-thought
You can't just list a player as 100%, force other teams to gameplan for him and then under-utilize him citing how the knee felt that day.
https://operations.nfl.com/updates/football-ops/2017-nfl-injury-report-policy/
Gurley wasn't listed on the NFC Championship injury or game status reports and should have been. And it's clear based on his usage he wasn't 100% in the Super Bowl, but he wasn't listed there either.
Based on the above, this could possibly be a loophole in the policy (i.e. not listing a player and not deactivating them, but simply using them less), but there's just too much smoke to this. You don't just sit a potential MVP candidate in the 2 biggest games of the year. The Rams should have to answer for this.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...eys-knee-was-more-hurt-than-initially-thought
You can't just list a player as 100%, force other teams to gameplan for him and then under-utilize him citing how the knee felt that day.
The Practice Report provides clubs and fans with an accurate description of a player’s injury status and how much he participated in practice during the week. If any player has a significant or noteworthy injury, it must be listed on the practice report, even if he fully participates in practice and the team expects that he will play in the team’s next game. This is especially important for key players whose injuries may be covered extensively by the media.
https://operations.nfl.com/updates/football-ops/2017-nfl-injury-report-policy/
Gurley wasn't listed on the NFC Championship injury or game status reports and should have been. And it's clear based on his usage he wasn't 100% in the Super Bowl, but he wasn't listed there either.
If a player was listed on the club’s Practice Report during the week, but is not listed on the club’s Game Status Report, it means that the club is certain the player will play. If the player is then deactivated for the game, the club will be required to provide an explanation. If the explanation is inadequate or unpersuasive, a compliance investigation or enforcement proceeding may be initiated.
Based on the above, this could possibly be a loophole in the policy (i.e. not listing a player and not deactivating them, but simply using them less), but there's just too much smoke to this. You don't just sit a potential MVP candidate in the 2 biggest games of the year. The Rams should have to answer for this.