Offline
Sticky Post
If my memory serves me right we didn't see LM til the second half last week. I am getting tired of screaming at the tv 
Actually you’re correct. Everyone here uses known abbreviations for well known players. SP= Sean Payton, DB= Drew Brees, MT= Michael Thomas, AK= Alvin Kamara and so forth. Either it’s their first day or they don’t pay attention very well. Anyone who disagrees can just look at any other thread here and they will see these used throughoutWOW, who's AK<, SP, MT, are you new here
Do you ask the hundreds of other posters that refer to players in that fashion, if they are lazy???
thank youActually you’re correct. Everyone here uses known abbreviations for well known players. SP= Sean Payton, DB= Drew Brees, MT= Michael Thomas, AK= Alvin Kamara and so forth. Either it’s their first day or they don’t pay attention very well. Anyone who disagrees can just look at any other thread here and they will see these used throughout
Me, too.lateral meniscus. I agree with OP, I hope all the knee cartilage is present for the entire game.
Have you acknowledged yet how your memory failed you?what's wrong with 4.2 average??
not lately RobinHave you acknowledged yet how your memory failed you?
Because Murray played in the first half last week.not lately Robin
Then I don't think we disagree. I think he is a good back, and maybe in another system that didn't ask so much of the RB in the passing game and that didn't have a generational talent ahead of him, maybe he's the starter. But I just don't think the key to our offense is to get the ball the Murray more. Especially when Hill is starting at QB and he is the same kind of power runner that Murray is.Murray has been a bellcow before, 2015 in Oakland when he also made the AFC Pro Bowl team. After that, he started 23 games over the next two seasons, including 11 in 2017 with Minnesota after rookie Dalvin Cook went down.
I never said he was an elite, or necessarily even a top-10 bellcow running back. But I do think he's been an above-replacement-level running back his entire career.
He was a year younger last year and he only did that for a few games. Plus, age 30 is usually the point that RBs start to go downhill fast.I think last year's starts (esp against Arizona) prove otherwise.
No one is saying feed Murray 30 touches and make Kamara the change-of-pace guy. I think what's being proposed is just going run-heavy while Hill starts -- and thus mixing in Murray some more than normal.
Agreed. LM does not impress me what so ever.I don't get the obsession with this middling running back.
I totally get what your saying. They could use him a little more. He’s a freight train. He can fall over and get 5 yards he’s so big.If my memory serves me right we didn't see LM til the second half last week. I am getting tired of screaming at the tv![]()
Just because you are not a fan of abbrevs doesn't mean they weren't being clear.Sorry not a fan of abbreviations. You need to be clear who or what you talking about.
That saying doesn't mean what you think it means.There's a lotta people on here playing fast and loose with all these acronyms. Like just type their name, dang.
Where's this 1.9 number he mentioned coming from?You just going to ignore the fact that Kamara is averaging 4.7 YPC this season while Murray is averaging 4.2 YPC this season? Murray is a good RB, but Kamara is elite when you add in his receiving skills. Taking snaps away from an elite back like Kamara, who both runs and catches passes better than Murray, to give more carries to a one dimensional power back doesn't seem to be a very wise move to me.
He's been on the team long enough and is a big enough name for people to know who LM should be, it's not like he was talking about Carl Granderson and said CG.Could have at least said LM28. Heck, most people post AK41 or TH7.
Thread starter | Title | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Are we really a second half team? | Saints Super Forum (Main Board) | 13 |