Zztop
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2012
- Messages
- 6,707
- Reaction score
- 9,644
Offline
Too much trauma still exists after the 2010 playoff AT Seattle (a 7-9 team)... well all know how that ended
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Unless they plan on taking Lombardi's name off the trophy and replacing it with Shula....
They should not change the emphasis away from Division winners deserving the best playoff spots. 2nd place at best deserves a wild card road game. In reality its debatable whether you belong in the playoffs if you dont win the division. If you cant beat a 6-10 road team you certainly dont belong.
Consider 1967 (the year the Saints were born), the Packers under Lombardi were on their way to win their 2nd Superbowl. However they didnt have the best regular season record . The best regular season record was 11-1-2 owned by Shula's Colts. Shula however did not even get to play in the playoffs. Why? Because he happened to be tied with the LA Rams who beat them head-to-head as his only loss. In 1967 their were 4 division and only the division winners got to go into the playoffs.
So as you can see, Lombardi's name likely wouldnt be on the trophy if Division winners did not get the best playoff spots.
I guess your missing my point. As long as Lombardis name is on the trophy a 6-10 division winner belongs in a prime playoff spot while a 12-4 team that finishes 2nd in their division doesnt deserve to be in the playoffs let alone get a home game.I do appreciate your knowledge of the game’s history. But double-digit-win teams aren’t the issue here. Situations like what’s developing over in the NFC Least this year are what present good arguments for seeding teams by straight-up record. And lest we not forget those 2010 Seachickens!