I think we should invade Iraq... (1 Viewer)

[TPS]

Word on the streets is there are 14,000 US-supplied missing weapons in Iraq.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/30/iraq.audits.ap/index.html

TPSeemsi'veheardthatstorybefore

 

[xpuma20x]

Perhaps I've missed something within the last few years...but haven't we already invaded Iraq?

 

[TPS]

>>Perhaps I've missed something within the last few years...but haven't we already invaded Iraq?

We invaded them (one of the reasons given anyway) because there were missing weapons. So since there are now actually documented cases of missing US Supplied weapons (probably some killing our own troops and our allies' troops), we should remain consistent and invade again. Don't you think?

TPS

 

[killah]

I think we should give them more weapons to further aggravate the "sectarian" violence between the Shiite and Sunnis. Then we can maintain a presence in Iraq and maybe even put a base there, maybe even a big one, like in the North.

wink, wink.

 

[Ric Romero]

<sarcasm>Rumsfield sure knows how to run a war.</sarcasm>

 

[cruize]

I think we should stay the course.

 

[Saint by the Bay]

I think we should stay the course.

Tony Snow says "Stop saying that!"

 

[DadsDream]

Anybody got an inventory list on the stuff we gave Saddam before we decided he was a bad guy?

 

[TPS]

>>Anybody got an inventory list on the stuff we gave Saddam before we decided he was a bad guy?

I think we denied the whole thing, but it probably mostly consisted of old chemical munitions, probably some enriched uranium, sarin gas, and some mustard extract which they say goes well with Kurds.

'Cause remember, we knew he had it. The U.N. did not.

TPS