- Joined
- Nov 13, 2017
- Messages
- 3,366
- Reaction score
- 6,826
Offline
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They've got Tevin Coleman rated higher than Mark Ingram? Ingram is WAY better than Coleman.
Coleman is also 25 and his best years may be ahead of him. We have probably already seen the best of Mark.
That said, for our particular team, I'd prefer the continuity Ingram offers, especially since he knows the playbook through and through. If I was another team though, I'd probably rate Coleman slightly higher due to age and explosiveness.
Meh... Coleman got his chance to shine as the #1 RB in a supposedly high-powered offense, and he largely sucked. He's younger and has more straightline speed, but he's not the RB MI is... not even close.
That is a good list. Agree about the dire need for TE.
Don't agree about our WRs being rated that highly, though. Thomas is elite. Arguably the best in the game. But we don't have enough around him to be that high.
Side note: Wonder if we give Golden Tate a look.
Tate. If you can’t beat him, join him?
Tate is as tough as an overcooked pork chop. If we don't at least try to get him shame on us.
Who's been spying on my kitchen? Better check my webcam.
Lol ya blame it on WilliamsDon't agree on our safety ranking... If Williams could diagnose a play against LA to save his life. We would of beat them. We gave some ridiculous big plays against LAon the deep end. Especially, at the very end of the game.