Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia (1 Viewer)

Spicoli

Guest
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
115
Age
59
Location
Temecula, CA
Offline
By JONATHAN KARL AND MARTIN CLANCY


WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2006 —

U.S. officials say they have found smoking-gun evidence of Iranian support for terrorists in Iraq: brand-new weapons fresh from Iranian factories. According to a senior defense official, coalition forces have recently seized Iranian-made weapons and munitions that bear manufacturing dates in 2006.


This suggests, say the sources, that the material is going directly from Iranian factories to Shia militias, rather than taking a roundabout path through the black market. "There is no way this could be done without (Iranian) government approval," says a senior official.

Read More

http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=2688501
 

Random Fan

Guest
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
Messages
852
Reaction score
0
Location
New Orleans
Offline
And so it begins... I wonder if we'll have a nice little War Powers conflict in Bush's last two years.
 

Dave

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
7,054
Reaction score
1,657
Offline
Captain's Quarters blog on this story:
I find the timing of this revelation very interesting. We know the James Baker-led Iraq Study Group has prepared its recommendations, because they've been busy leaking them a week ahead of the deadline. We know that they will urge the Bush administration to reverse almost thirty years of foreign policy and engage Teheran in direct negotiations regarding security for Iraq. We also know that the Joint Chiefs have already decided to oppose the main thrusts of the ISG.

Now, suddenly, ABC News finds out that the Pentagon has found the Imam Label on insurgent weapons. Does it appear to anyone else that someone at the Department of Defense has decided to pre-empt the ISG and its call for negotiated surrender to state-sponsored terrorism?

We heard the rumor last week that Hezbollah had been training Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army, perhaps hosting as many as 2,000 militia fighters. ABC adds to that as well, revealing that the Pentagon believes Sadr to have over 40,000 fighters in his irregulars, much higher than anyone supposed before this. The Iranians have built up quite a force in Iraq, and now that we're on the verge of hearing from the ISG, we now find out that the Iranians have been conducting a proxy war against us. Not that the news surprises those who have followed the situation, but the extent of their success is worrisome.

This may be the backlash of the generals against the so-called realists. No one in the command structure wants to see the US retreat from Iraq; even the retired generals who have hurled so much criticism at Donald Rumsfeld made it clear that we have to prevail in Iraq. This puts the White House in a huge bind; with this in the open, the US has to respond to the Iranians, and a summit would be seen as a massive capitulation. On the other hand, the ISG's long-awaited report raised expectations of a change in near- and medium-term strategy, expectations that will cause political repercussions once dashed.

If the report is true and the Iranians have been directly supplying the insurgents with the materiel that has killed and wounded many American soldiers, then we have to finally acknowledge that the war on terror has evolved into a confrontation with terrorism's leading state sponsor. The Bush administration has spent a lot of effort in denying this, working through the UN Security Council and the EU. It cannot ignore it any longer, and in the end, we knew that we would have to confront Iran and Syria in some fashion if we wanted to put an end to state-sponsored terrorism.
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/008603.php
 

dapperdan

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Jul 29, 1998
Messages
11,564
Reaction score
7,838
Age
59
Location
Juanita Beach, WA
Offline
And so it begins... I wonder if we'll have a nice little War Powers conflict in Bush's last two years.

Begins? Where have you been. This has been widely accepted, at least on the intelligence blogs I've been reading, for roughly two years, maybe a little longer.

Maybe I'm reading more into your words than is meant, but you seem to be implying that this is somehow being cooked up by the Bush Administration.
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

 

New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

 

Headlines

Top Bottom