It's way early, but... (Hill or Savage) (1 Viewer)

[ndcc]

If you had your druthers, who would be in... who would be out: Savage or Hill (at QB)?

 

[greg8710]

Hill. Me an someone else agreed haha

 

[northshore_mike]

Vote would have been easier if it was "who do you want to see out." It's pretty clear Savage is not the answer. Jury still out on Hill.

 

[Saints 4 life]

 

[LiterOCola]

View: https://twitter.com/nick_underhill/status/1027727032363503617?s=21

 

[Bill]

You're right ndcc... waaaaaay too early.

 

[BBarnes]

If you had your druthers, who would be in... who would be out: Savage or Hill (at QB)?

Whoops I accidentally voted for Savage.

 

[BBarnes]

View: https://twitter.com/nick_underhill/status/1027727032363503617?s=21

Fun experiences at the QB position doesn’t do anything good for a team. It’s just fun to talk about

 

[superchuck500]

Savage as the traditional two and Hill as the third QB and special teams ace including holding duties and some limited wildcat/special-play usage.

 

[Nashville Saint]

I said this in another post but WHAT IF JT Barrett started lighting it up... Just saying the kid has a boatload of potential look at what he did in Ohio state

 

[bongatong]

Ehh hill was exciting made some really nice passes good not great. Savage held the ball too long made some good passes a lot of them were behind receivers he good not great....so with all of that hill

 

[bongatong]

I said this in another post but WHAT IF JT Barrett started lighting it up... Just saying the kid has a boatload of potential look at what he did in Ohio state

Not hitting a wide open Scott for a yd isn't a great start

 

[RetroMcBananaFace]

I think I said this is another thread but I think Savage is the guy to be the "backup" since that's a person Brees leans on to help with in-game adjustments, breaking down film and so on.

If I had to pick one that gave us a better chance to win, it would be Hill, albeit he would probably be playing more in the 2000ish Aaron Brooks "run around and make a play" mold.

so in lieu of one solid, complete option, I think we probably end up keeping them both.

 

[bongatong]

I think I said this is another thread but I think Savage is the guy to be the "backup" since that's a person Brees leans on to help with in-game adjustments, breaking down film and so on.

If I had to pick one that gave us a better chance to win, it would be Hill, albeit he would probably be playing more in the 2000ish Aaron Brooks "run around and make a play" mold.

so in lieu of one solid, complete option, I think we probably end up keeping them both.

Yeah hill isn't going anywhere jist for his special teams alone I mean he almost had a block last night.

 

[Saint Greg]

I think we keep both. Savage as the backup and Hill as 3rd QB/special teams. Hill is one of our best special teams players and I don’t think we’d have him running around out there if he were our only backup QB.