harschman
Hall-of-Famer
Online
Here's a poll on MSNBC.com. Currently LSU is at 81%.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22382241/?pg=10#spt_FBC_team_of_decade
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22382241/?pg=10#spt_FBC_team_of_decade
Beat me to it. I think I'd vote for FSU before I'd vote for Miami.How is Miami even an option?
Last time I checked LSU is the only 2 time BCS National Champion and since the BCS National Champion is the only one recognized in the 2000's then that means LSU has TWO and USC has ONE.that poll is nuts. LSU and USC should be much closer...both have 2 national titles and SC has been to more BCS bowl games, with a 5-1 record.
...i give the edge to SC, but its close.
Last time I checked LSU is the only 2 time BCS National Champion and since the BCS National Champion is the only one recognized in the 2000's then that means LSU has TWO and USC has ONE.
Thanks for the link. It validates my point.There are multiple national titles, all recognized. You can debate whether a team deserved them, or which national title is more relevant, but you can't debate that they aren't recognized.
In fact, even Oklahoma won a 2003 national title.
http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/ia_football_past_champs.html
Since 1998, the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) has conducted a bowl contest between it's two top-ranked teams to determine a national champion.
A number of polling organizations also provide a final ranking of Division I-A football teams at the end of each season.
That's probably not necessary. I think maybe LSU has it now. At close to 45,000 votes LSU is at 84%.44,000 votes and LSU 84%.
I voted at least 10 times. Delete your cookies and return to the site to vote again.
44,000 votes and LSU 84%.
I voted at least 10 times. Delete your cookies and return to the site to vote again.
Yeah, I don't necessarily disagree with LSU being the team of the decade. I do think USC is far closer than people here think, and I do believe a case could be made either way. I think USC has been flashier (Matt Leinart vs. Matt Mauk and Matt Flynn) (Reggie Bush and Lindell White vs. Justin Vincent and Jacob Hester) and that gets them a lot of pull from the media. I wouldn't have it at 80%, I'd have it closer to probably 55% or so, but I would lean towards LSU. But, and this is a big but, there's still 2 more years in the decade for someone to truly distance themselves from the pack either way.Thanks for the link. It validates my point.
No kidding. People talk about USC being loaded but lets take a quick look at that Miami title team:Those teams were dominant, and the players in the NFL and the impact they had just goes to show how purely talented those teams were.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Saints fans were great | Saints Super Forum (Main Board) | 1 | |
![]() |
Too many 49ers fans today | Saints Super Forum (Main Board) | 73 | |
49ers fans had a second line today | Saints Super Forum (Main Board) | 15 |