"Make it, take it" rule in effect tomorrow at Probowl as a test. (Onside kick alternative) (1 Viewer)

OutlawSaint

formerly SeLuSaint
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
10,823
Reaction score
13,369
Age
29
Location
Hammond
Offline
Should be interesting to see if it is even put into action by a team.


"Team A may elect to give Team B the ball at Team B’s 25-yard line, beginning a new series of downs with a first-and-10.

"Or, Team A may elect to take the ball at its own 25-yard line for a fourth-and-15 play.

"If Team A is successful in making a first down, Team A will maintain possession and a new series of downs will continue as normal.

"If Team A is unsuccessful in making a first down, the result will be a turnover on downs and Team B will take possession at the dead ball spot."
 

FootballLady

Super Forum Fanatic
VIP Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
6,922
Reaction score
14,415
Age
42
Offline
Wow, that's...interesting. An awful lot of risk in trying that for the offense.
 

FootballLady

Super Forum Fanatic
VIP Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
6,922
Reaction score
14,415
Age
42
Offline
Yes, NFL football rules have clearly proven not successful enough to build a billion dollar industry. Let's monkey with the rules.
The NFL has routinely made rule alterations over the past decades, many of them leading to their current success. If they can implement others that increase player safety as well, why not do it?
 

HouseCall

Resist, Ronald, resist!
Joined
Dec 7, 1998
Messages
4,892
Reaction score
6,444
Age
43
Offline
Yes, NFL football rules have clearly proven not successful enough to build a billion dollar industry. Let's monkey with the rules.
Yup. But they are also facing millions, possibly billions of dollars in concussion lawsuits, so they will do everything they can to look like they are trying to make the game safer — while still pushing an 18 game season and balking at the idea of roster expansion.
 

gavinj

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Apr 12, 2004
Messages
9,389
Reaction score
5,482
Offline
Going for 4th and 15th from your own 25 seems extremely punishing if you don’t convert. If you don’t recover an onside kick the other team would have the ball probably around the 50. Id like to see this play from your own 35 instead.
I think the idea there is to prevent Hail Marys. A few QBs can throw it 70 yards in the air.
 

dutar76

4th Year Vet
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
9,155
Reaction score
15,705
Location
Oberlin, LA
Offline
Wow, that's...interesting. An awful lot of risk in trying that for the offense.
Not if you're playing against us. 4th and 15? We'd never stop that. And even if we did, illegal hands to the face or DPI or D-holding... 1st down.

Guys, if they implement this rule, we'll never get the ball again.
 
OP
OP
OutlawSaint

OutlawSaint

formerly SeLuSaint
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
10,823
Reaction score
13,369
Age
29
Location
Hammond
Offline
If they made it only allowable in the last 3 or 4 minutes of the game, it could make some blowouts/comebacks interesting.
And that is the ONLY positive gist I can scrape out of this.

But I too hate this rule.
You would think teams would only use this rule when needed huh? So it would be when they are down by a lot or towards the end of the game when they need the ball back.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)



Headlines

Top Bottom