- Admin
- #76
Offline
I don’t care if he really is mediocre or not. We are 5-0 when he needed to step up and that’s all that matters. Glad we have him and not some guy fumbling and throwing picks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
There are currently only a few QBs in the league that can carry a bad team...and yet there are currently 18 QBs currently making over $20 million/season. Of course he's going to get paid a bunch of money. The current going rate for a starting QB is over $20 million/season. There is only two starters not on their rookie contract that are making less...Andy Dalton and Jacoby Brissett (they're both making over $15 million/season).
I wonder if the franchise quarterback narrative has been pushed too far.
Why is it better to have a great QB who is super expensive and having a thin team than it is to have a really good and affordable QB and a deep team?
I wouldn't want to pay Teddy like Brees, but I'd love to have Teddy on a good contract.
We have won 5 straight games against a good crop of teams. We did that by having a great team and a QB who won't make mistakes and will make a few great plays a game.
I'll take that
Exactly what I said in the other thread. If Bridgewater is your QB, and I think Payton has seen enough to know he is, you pay him, even if it means sitting him on the bench behind Brees for one more farewell season.
Heck, if it means loosing Kamara, you still pay him. I don't think that happens, but there's no question QB is the most important position.
Yea if there’s one guy you want to listen to it’s Matt Hasselbeck, for his 212 TDs he’s chased them down with 153 Interceptions... he knows about ELEVATING a team.
Thankfully the internet has kept track of his stats or else I’d not remember a thing he did in football
I think people are too invested 1 way or another in this to think clearly. Bridgewater simply isn't as good as some people are making him, and he isn't as bad as others are saying he is. He is a mid level starter that requires a solid defense and a plus running game.
We have to realize Brees is one of the top 3 QBs to play. Ever. It is highly unlikely you catch lightning in a bottle again. So then you wonder, do we settle on Bridgewater and pay him starter money to backup another season, or do we let him walk and hope Brees goes another 2 years and draft a QB.
The catch22 is, you pay 2 QBs starter money, you have to skimp on other positions that are required to be + level starters in order for Bridgewater to win games. Brees can win with a bottom 3rd defense, he has for most of his career. Bridgewater needs help, I don't think he can win with a bottom 3rd defense. And theres NOTHING wrong with that. You aren't going to have a top 3 all time QB multiple times.
All I'm saying is, Bridgewater going to the Skins or Bengals is a disaster for him. He can start, and get paid, but that's just an awful position to put him in. He is not a franchise savior like Brees was. He is a piece of the puzzle.
But I do agree that this is a situation the FO is going to have to ask of Brees. If he wants to play another 2-3, fine. I think he can outperform Bridgewater for 2-3 more years. But I think Bridgewater has played well enough that they are going to want Brees to be more concrete about his plans.
I think people are too invested 1 way or another in this to think clearly. Bridgewater simply isn't as good as some people are making him, and he isn't as bad as others are saying he is. He is a mid level starter that requires a solid defense and a plus running game.
We have to realize Brees is one of the top 3 QBs to play. Ever. It is highly unlikely you catch lightning in a bottle again. So then you wonder, do we settle on Bridgewater and pay him starter money to backup another season, or do we let him walk and hope Brees goes another 2 years and draft a QB.
The catch22 is, you pay 2 QBs starter money, you have to skimp on other positions that are required to be + level starters in order for Bridgewater to win games. Brees can win with a bottom 3rd defense, he has for most of his career. Bridgewater needs help, I don't think he can win with a bottom 3rd defense. And theres NOTHING wrong with that. You aren't going to have a top 3 all time QB multiple times.
All I'm saying is, Bridgewater going to the Skins or Bengals is a disaster for him. He can start, and get paid, but that's just an awful position to put him in. He is not a franchise savior like Brees was. He is a piece of the puzzle.
But I do agree that this is a situation the FO is going to have to ask of Brees. If he wants to play another 2-3, fine. I think he can outperform Bridgewater for 2-3 more years. But I think Bridgewater has played well enough that they are going to want Brees to be more concrete about his plans.
Noice!! TBH, I don't think the Hasselback family GETS irony, though.Wow if he thought that little of him he should have said his ceiling was Matt Hassleback
This the most difficult part. Most of the great qbs finish with other teams because they want to play longer than they should. Montana, Farve, Manning, etc. Which would you rather have a possibility of a SB or 50 mil + for you and your family? Taking 7 mil. over 50 mil doesn't sound to smart to me. Winning a trophy vs. setting up potential generational wealth.Teddy has already proven himself to be a very smart young man. Smart money says Teddy stays, looking ahead to be in the driver's seat of the Lamborghini rather than settling for a Ford, Toyota, or possibly a Yugo. jmo, I could be dead wrong, but I think Teddy is smart enough to know a good thing when he is grasping it with both hands already. Of course, this is contingent on how how long Drew wants to keep playing.