Media bias covers over Pats indescretions? (1 Viewer)

Did you notice a bias in coverage of the Pats?

  • Yes, I felt like the media in general covered over the Pats failings.

    Votes: 12 80.0%
  • No, I think the coverage was fair and balanced. (or against the Pats)

    Votes: 3 20.0%

  • Total voters
    15

bergeaux

Building my own team!
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
15,733
Reaction score
3,275
Location
Washington DC
Offline
Did anyone else feel like ESPN, Fox, CBS, heck the NFL Network and all that I noticed seemed to downplay the Pats cheating, bad attitudes, favorable calls, etc and always hype them up as perfect and ignore failings?

I assume this is because of the hype value of a perfect team vs. any detraction that would have brought down the sales value of the hype.

Am I wrong, or do others see this as well?
 
A perfect season is a huge story, you have to expect the sports media to hype it. I thought there has been tons of coverage of spygate, with various commentators taking different sides on it.
 
A perfect season is a huge story, you have to expect the sports media to hype it. I thought there has been tons of coverage of spygate, with various commentators taking different sides on it.


While I understand hyping a possible perfect season, it was rather lopsided in it's coverage. The Giants segments were miniscule while the Pats coverage was forced down your throat.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom