- Joined
- Jan 23, 2000
- Messages
- 7,418
- Reaction score
- 587
- Age
- 69
Offline
Guess that makes it right then.
The rest of your post is simply an attempt to change the subject, since you know that it's incredibly out-of-line to make fun of a 12 year-old girl in the press.
It's politics; everything's on the table. She's 27 years old. What's the statute of limitations on filial criticism? Is Bush 43 off limits because he's Presidential spawn?
Currently, Clinton is attempting to count the DNC-rejected Michigan and Florida primaries which were effectively uncontested. . She is acquiring just 33% of the internet monies garnered by Obama, and floated an unsecured loan of $5 million from her own account, lest it be contaminated by her husbands' sources of cash from China, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and Kazakhstan. And that's just Asia.
Chelsea is part of that process, for the reasons detailed in my attempt above to "change the subject". I have no brief one way or the other. A Clinton presidency would be entertaining and worthy of a vote for that reason alone.
Obama is not ready now, nor in 2012, nor in 2016. Chelsea will.