Ratings are down. I know why my interest is down, curious how many agree or think it is different.
The rules have been changed to make offense so predominant that usually if a team doesn't score it is their own ineptitude rather than defensive work. Defenses are so limited by the rules to make the game "more exciting by higher scoring".
The officials call the game based on the outcome that the NFL finds favorable. The rules leave so much gray area that the officials control enough of the game to keep the score close and the "right" team in the lead. How else can you explain the officiating never being consistent. The NFL decided close game shootouts are exciting so they try and create it. The flaw in this is that it has become like college basketball in that all you need to watch are the last 4 minutes of each half and the highlights and you've got the game. Why watch when it's team scores, other team scores, team score, other team scores and the last team to score wins. It would be different if ALL of the games didn't go this way. Think it's not being manufactured??? Look at the scores. Most are within one score. I find it hard to believe that this is "true parity", and believe it is manufactured by the rules and the officiating.
A penalty should be a penalty no matter WHAT the score is. This is absolutely NOT the current case. Pass interference and defensive holding are called so inconstantly in the same game that it HAS to be based on desired outcome.
I'm thinking they should let the players wear outrageous capes and props and institute tag team plays. Worked for a while with the silly (not) wrestling thing. Give em megaphones and let em go at it.
Kris
The rules have been changed to make offense so predominant that usually if a team doesn't score it is their own ineptitude rather than defensive work. Defenses are so limited by the rules to make the game "more exciting by higher scoring".
The officials call the game based on the outcome that the NFL finds favorable. The rules leave so much gray area that the officials control enough of the game to keep the score close and the "right" team in the lead. How else can you explain the officiating never being consistent. The NFL decided close game shootouts are exciting so they try and create it. The flaw in this is that it has become like college basketball in that all you need to watch are the last 4 minutes of each half and the highlights and you've got the game. Why watch when it's team scores, other team scores, team score, other team scores and the last team to score wins. It would be different if ALL of the games didn't go this way. Think it's not being manufactured??? Look at the scores. Most are within one score. I find it hard to believe that this is "true parity", and believe it is manufactured by the rules and the officiating.
A penalty should be a penalty no matter WHAT the score is. This is absolutely NOT the current case. Pass interference and defensive holding are called so inconstantly in the same game that it HAS to be based on desired outcome.
I'm thinking they should let the players wear outrageous capes and props and institute tag team plays. Worked for a while with the silly (not) wrestling thing. Give em megaphones and let em go at it.
Kris