- Banned
- #1
BulldogSaint
Very Banned
Offline
This guy's antics know no bounds
http://blogs.usatoday.com/thehuddle...ocincos-plan-to-use-twitter-during-games.html
http://blogs.usatoday.com/thehuddle...ocincos-plan-to-use-twitter-during-games.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Every team the Bengals play should be in favor of it. First of all, Chad Goofball might inadvertently let useful info slip to the other team. Secondly, how much coaching will he be getting between plays if he is Twittering? Wouldn't you want your opponent's star receiver distracting himself with nonsense on the sidelines? I sure would. I'd like to see Jake Delhomme take up Twittering too.
Twittering during a game is about as smart as listening to your iPod while trying to make a 10 foot putt.
If he wants to be stupid, I say let him.
More power to him.
/it's a friggen game for christsake. Lighten up Francis(s)
More power to him.
/it's a friggen game for christsake. Lighten up Francis(s)
It's not just a game to the owners paying their salaries...as his boss, I'd want his attention on his job 100%, not on his Twitter habit. Even when not on the field, his attention needs to be on his teammates on the field, his coaches, his mental state, and the technicalities and adjustments that are made throughout the game. A 30 second break to Twitter isn't necessary, IMO. Save it for after the game.
It is a game, and it's also about entertainment. People aren't entertained when the home team loses because someone was busy Twittering. It could be done without being a distraction, but (1) there's no reason for it, and (2) the owner won't make any more money off of it, so why should the NFL (who reps the owners) allow him to do it? Definitely a business decision.