Offline
i meant imagine if right now in a fictional draft we have the #8 pick, Atlanta has the #9 and Ravens got #10. Say we want a OL at #8. Atlanta wants a DT and so do the ravens. the ravens call us b/c they want the DT. We are rivals with atlanta so why don't we trade back two picks still get the guy we want and hurt atlanta at the same time.
This is what i hope we can do to the Bengals with the ravens. Bengals are rumored to want a DT. So wy don't we just trade with a division rival of the bengals. I think it will be hard for the bengals to move up unless they give up tons of stuff because of being in the AFC and the point system. #4 oakland #5 chiefs #6 jets #7 new england #8 Ravens #9 Bengals. all are AFC so if we can just survive till #7 and it would be great if a Dallas trade happens so we can have a QB or other Offense player fall if mcfadden is selected by Dallas. we could possibly end up with Ellis or Dorsey. the only other team the makes me nervous is new england. they are know to want to accumulate picks but i can see them go CB or LB.
OK, thats what I thought you meant, LOL.
I see the angle now, 4,5,6,7, and 8 are all AFC.
I have suggested on other posts that if we do trade, why not NE at 7? So, as I read posts on this trade stuff I see us trading over Cincy as if they have no choices.
What's to stop them from moving ahead of 8, with the trade to 7? Because NE would'n trade with an AFC team? No. I guess I mean that since everyone else can possibly trade up, why do we assume no one will.
I don't think I have this worded right, I hope ya'll see what I'm saying.
ddd