gregh
The Real Deal
Offline
total difference than (i dont know what the 3-4 is ) jenkins huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Smith is gone! He doesn't fit the 3-4 scheme.
If he wants to stay in the NFL he will have to switch to a DT in the 4-3. He is painfully slow as a DE....
IIRC when we signed Bunkley he was rated as the best against the run playing primarily a NT type postion for Denver. I think it would make more since for him to play there and start Hicks and Jordan at the end spots, while getting a DE in the 3 or 4th round for depth.
Why do people keep saying this? He was terrible against the run last year. Teams ran at him instead of running at Cam Jordan.I think Will Smith is actually a much better fit in a 3-4 than a 4-3. He is not an edge rusher, but he is effective against the run at the point of attack. He weighs about 290 which is in the range of what you want in a 3-4 DE. At this point in his career, and at his price, is it worth keeping him around to try and see if he can make the switch?? Not so sure about that.
I think Hicks is too big to play DE in the 3-4. I realize 3-4 DEs have to be bigger than 4-3 DEs, but Hicks is just too big for that role. Hicks is more of a space eater, so I think NT would be a more natural position for him. Cam Jordan, on the other hand, would be just about perfect for that position (DE in a base 3-4). If we don't keep Will Smith, I think we will have to look for another DE to play opposite Jordan (I don't see anyone on the current roster who could do it).
I think Hicks is too big to play DE in the 3-4. I realize 3-4 DEs have to be bigger than 4-3 DEs, but Hicks is just too big for that role. Hicks is more of a space eater, so I think NT would be a more natural position for him. Cam Jordan, on the other hand, would be just about perfect for that position (DE in a base 3-4). If we don't keep Will Smith, I think we will have to look for another DE to play opposite Jordan (I don't see anyone on the current roster who could do it).
I think Hicks is too big to play DE in the 3-4. I realize 3-4 DEs have to be bigger than 4-3 DEs, but Hicks is just too big for that role. Hicks is more of a space eater, so I think NT would be a more natural position for him. Cam Jordan, on the other hand, would be just about perfect for that position (DE in a base 3-4). If we don't keep Will Smith, I think we will have to look for another DE to play opposite Jordan (I don't see anyone on the current roster who could do it).
Jarvis instead of vilma!
If Hicks going to play LDE which OLB is going to play behind him? Also, where is Lofton going to be on the ILB spot? Is Lofton going to be between Cam and Bunkley, or will he be between Bunkley and Hicks?
The reason i think Will Smith will stay is because as he menitoned. We ran some 3-4 concepts under Williams b-4 so he is familiar with the system.
Beyond Will Smith/Cam Jordan/Akiem Hicks/Bunkley...we don't know if any of these guys can fit in the system. So releasing smith would create a depth issue beyond the big 3. Well retaining smith will allow us to have hicks backup BOTH end spots and Bunkley@ Nose.
This would allow us to take someone like the other NT from georgia in like the 6th round and bring him around slowly 4 a year.
LDE Cam Jordan/Hicks/Tom Johnson or Tyrunn Walker
RDE Will Smith/Hicks
DT Bunkley/Hicks/draft pick
He could come in and spell everyone as hes capable of playing the nose 0tech/ 1 tech and both DE spots.
It means having to spend as little resources as possible in FA along the line because of a lack of depth.
Like Canton always says.
U don't just release good players..if u don't know who ur going to replace them with. Or if said replacement is really better.
Will Smith is still a good player.......just not a RDE in a 4-3 defense. His edge rushing days are wayyyy behind him.
We'd have to trade up at least 8-10 spots to get hJarvis Jones. Without a 2nd round pick to add in the mix, what are we going to give to get there?
So we have the players for out front 3? That would be sweet because with the back 4 in Loften, Vilma(with a contract cut), Wilson, and Hawthorne, would be nice or at least be decent imho.
So then we would draft an Tackle in the 1st and maybe fix the secondary in the 3rd round our FA?
Might work??
Smith isn't good against the run...and contributes nothing as a pass rusher. He is owed a kings ransom next season. If they bring him back for next to nothing, then sure I wouldn't mind him as depth..but it will have to be a drastic pay cut.
The reason i think Will Smith will stay is because as he menitoned. We ran some 3-4 concepts under Williams b-4 so he is familiar with the system.
Beyond Will Smith/Cam Jordan/Akiem Hicks/Bunkley...we don't know if any of these guys can fit in the system. So releasing smith would create a depth issue beyond the big 3. Well retaining smith will allow us to have hicks backup BOTH end spots and Bunkley@ Nose.
This would allow us to take someone like the other NT from georgia in like the 6th round and bring him around slowly 4 a year.
LDE Cam Jordan/Hicks/Tom Johnson or Tyrunn Walker
RDE Will Smith/Hicks
DT Bunkley/Hicks/draft pick
He could come in and spell everyone as hes capable of playing the nose 0tech/ 1 tech and both DE spots.
It means having to spend as little resources as possible in FA along the line because of a lack of depth.
Like Canton always says.
U don't just release good players..if u don't know who ur going to replace them with. Or if said replacement is really better.
Will Smith is still a good player.......just not a RDE in a 4-3 defense. His edge rushing days are wayyyy behind him.