drdwi
Veteran Starter
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2002
- Messages
- 298
- Reaction score
- 47
- Age
- 57
Offline
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Flat out wrong.If Loomis trades anything other than a conditional 7th, [NOPE]
I felt like I was reading an article written by ChatGPT.
well parts of the value of the pick could be to keep him from tampa and not let him hit true open free agency and increase his value. Raiders eating any cap that helps us would be icing on the cake.Y'all better watch it. You're about to be lectured on how Loomis will offer fair compensation for Carr.
Please stop being reasonable. That isn’t welcome.well parts of the value of the pick could be to keep him from tampa and not let him hit true open free agency and increase his value. Raiders eating any cap that helps us would be icing on the cake.
Sure.Please stop being reasonable. That isn’t welcome.
well parts of the value of the pick could be to keep him from tampa and not let him hit true open free agency and increase his value. Raiders eating any cap that helps us would be icing on the cake.
That won't be necessary . The Saints are allowed to talk to him prior to any deal and an agreement that makes his first year cap friendly could be done before any trade agreement is executed. That will lower the trade value ifrom what the Raiders will require if they take they have to take the cap hit this year themselves.Flat out wrong.
A trade would be in order to facilitate a renegotiated deal where LV eats a portion of the contract. That’s the value of the pick, whatever it would be.