- Joined
- Feb 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,932
- Reaction score
- 26,258
- Age
- 50
Online
Mick fails at acknowledging the gray area; he did the same with the deer.Do most GMs say that they are confident they have a QB they can lose with?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mick fails at acknowledging the gray area; he did the same with the deer.Do most GMs say that they are confident they have a QB they can lose with?
Good thing we won a few meaningless games under Rizzi!Hopefully, and I think, this marriage will only last one more year and is mostly because of the cap cost of cutting him this year. It gives me hope that Nick says that the Saints really like Cam Ward and it sound like if he fell to #9 (he won't), they would draft him. It also sounds like they would trade up for him, but the cost is too high right now.
If Carr is the starter next year we won’t need to move up. This is terrible news for a team that needs to blow it up in the worst way.I have been pretty vocal about wanting to move on from Carr (and no, not because I have some personal vendetta, it is just what I personally think is best for the team). But, if Carr IS the plan for 2025 then I hope like hell they trade down in this draft and recoup another first rounder next year so that we have the ammo to move up in 2026 for a QB, rather than mortgage future draft picks. Because we all know that Carr as QB1 = drafting in the teens. We’ll win just enough to keep us out of the top 5. And even if Carr balls out he is not the long term solution here.
Mick fails at acknowledging the gray area; he does the same with the Deer.
If Carr is the starter next year we won’t need to move up. This is terrible news for a team that needs to blow it up in the worst way.
Same. Can't wait. He's just very underwhelming.Carr reminds me so much of Brandon Ingram. Can't wait till he is gone
Agreed, the issue this creates however is you’re never putting yourself in the position to be the top or near the top of the draft to get one of the top QBs of that class. So if Carr Plays 15-17 games this year we’re going to have a pick as best as 12-14 in my opinion. What that means is come 2026 even when we move on from him, our cap will be better and we will be in a position to where we can actually spend a little money in free agency, the problem is we will not have our quarterback. And we will not be in a position to draft one especially after beefing up the roster in free agency 2026. I totally understand the cap implications and it makes sense financially to keep him until next year, but for the future of the roster construction, it does create a bit of a conundrum.The financials of cutting Carr have never made sense. They didn’t make sense two months ago and don’t today.
So what’s Moore going to do? Bench the best QB on the roster so he can hitch himself to a 5th round, second-year QB who went 0-7 last year just because? Maybe Moore builds a relationship with Rattler and becomes comfortable betting on him, but that’s going to take time.
Cutting Carr And starting Rattler would be a feel-good move for the fans, but it doesn’t add up otherwise. None of this means Carr is the QB in ‘26 or that we are making a long term commitment. It’s one bridge season and we see where it goes. As long as we keep chipping away at the cap issues, nothing really changes. It’s still a rebuild.
I may puke.So Mickey plans to restructure Carr and go all in on the salary cap again...
It was always a big ask to think Moore would willingly put himself in a position to not win.Agreed, the issue this creates however is you’re never putting yourself in the position to be the top or near the top of the draft to get one of the top QBs of that class. So if Carr Plays 15-17 games this year we’re going to have a pick as best as 12-14 in my opinion. What that means is come 2026 even when we move on from him, our cap will be better and we will be in a position to where we can actually spend a little money in free agency, the problem is we will not have our quarterback. And we will not be in a position to draft one especially after beefing up the roster in free agency 2026. I totally understand the cap implications and it makes sense financially to keep him until next year, but for the future of the roster construction, it does create a bit of a conundrum.
I feel that this is the year the damn breaks. We don’t have very much skill wise and the Oline needs major help.If that were true then keeping Carr would be fine. The issue is that Carr is just good enough to get you in the range of 7 to 9 wins which likely doesn't get you in the playoffs but also keeps you picking out of range of the top QBs.