No mo Saturday mail (1 Viewer)

Semper

Super Forum Fanatic
VIP Contributor
Joined
Sep 20, 1998
Messages
11,695
Reaction score
16,893
Age
53
Offline
Couldn't agree more. Will be nice not to get any bills on the weekend now.
 

jasonl55

Subscribing Member
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
May 9, 2002
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
293
Age
46
Offline
They could deliver three days a week and I would be fine. Mostly junk mail coming nowadays so keep cutting to reduce cost and try to become profitable.
 

BHM

Can't please 'em all
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
14,083
Age
57
Location
Lafayette, LA
Offline
What!!!!


Our email will not work on Saturdays!!!
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
14,226
Reaction score
8,403
Location
LA
Offline
So that means on Monday, I'll have double the preapproved offers!!! WAHOOOO!!!! The credit card industry is the only thing keeping USPS afloat.
 

Krewe of Clyde's

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
1,781
Reaction score
686
Location
Dalewood Lake
Offline
This is a move that should have been done a long time ago. I did notice that they will continue their package delivery and P.O. box delivery on Saturday.
 

BarBar

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
3,486
Reaction score
4,397
Offline
1 day a week would be enough.
 

kevinh

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
2,282
Reaction score
1,932
Online
Saw a good article today talking about how this is a manufactured crisis meant to cut more government services and open our mail system up to privatization, price gouging, etc.

"But what has been lost in the political debate over the Post Office is why it is losing this money. Major media coverage points to the rise of email or Internet services and the inefficiency of the post model as the major culprits. While these factors may cause some fiscal pain, almost all of the postal service’s losses over the last four years can be traced back to a single, artificial restriction forced onto the Post Office by the Republican-led Congress in 2006.

At the very end of that year, Congress passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA). Under PAEA, USPS was forced to “prefund its future health care benefit payments to retirees for the next 75 years in an astonishing ten-year time span” — meaning that it had to put aside billions of dollars to pay for the health benefits of employees it hasn’t even hired yet, something “that no other government or private corporation is required to do.”

A Manufactured 'Crisis': Congress Can Let The Post Office Save Itself Without Mass Layoffs Or Service Reductions | ThinkProgress
 

BarBar

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
3,486
Reaction score
4,397
Offline
Saw a good article today talking about how this is a manufactured crisis meant to cut more government services and open our mail system up to privatization, price gouging, etc.

"But what has been lost in the political debate over the Post Office is why it is losing this money. Major media coverage points to the rise of email or Internet services and the inefficiency of the post model as the major culprits. While these factors may cause some fiscal pain, almost all of the postal service’s losses over the last four years can be traced back to a single, artificial restriction forced onto the Post Office by the Republican-led Congress in 2006.

At the very end of that year, Congress passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA). Under PAEA, USPS was forced to “prefund its future health care benefit payments to retirees for the next 75 years in an astonishing ten-year time span” — meaning that it had to put aside billions of dollars to pay for the health benefits of employees it hasn’t even hired yet, something “that no other government or private corporation is required to do.”

A Manufactured 'Crisis': Congress Can Let The Post Office Save Itself Without Mass Layoffs Or Service Reductions | ThinkProgress


Good lord. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard. Almost any company would go bankrupt if they had to front thier health care costs for 75 years.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom