North American Union, NWO, Amero (1 Viewer)

[Bless U Boys]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo


What are everyone's thoughts on these topics. I guess I never concerned myself with all of these things, but a friend at work keeps "putting it in ear". Is it conspiracy theorist gone wild, or something more. Where are we heading?

 

[Reddoctober]

we are (thankfully/sarc) headed into a world where wacky conspiracy theories such as this will be outlawed as thought crime.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...=15&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...109&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7



so get your tin hat while you still can.

 

[Reddoctober]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_House_Resolution_1955


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIKzTDJabJE



i can sleep well tonight knowing that the government will shortly be able to make up my mind about how i feel about conspiracy theories for me.


after all whats out there that you don't hear on faux or msn everyday??


this stuff is garbage..


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...757&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=9841974

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...604&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...31&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...889&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

and this man is obviously a terrorist


http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...499&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


i say lock em up...for our own good.

 

[d3cyph3r]

What about the international super highway between canada and mexico

Some official in Canada was talking about it like it was happening, people just laughed if someone mentioned it in America. We shall see what happens I suppose.

 

[RebSaint]

I know both of you are Paulistas, but can you for the life of me post an original thought and not bombard the board with endless links.

Good grief.

 

[Reddoctober]

I know both of you are Paulistas, but can you for the life of me post an original thought and not bombard the board with endless links.

Good grief.

sure, can you persuade faux or your local major television network to play these on the newsreel so some of us don't have to resort to web-digging to give curious researchers like Blessyou the scoop on info they should be hearing about on primetime?:dunno:

 

[RebSaint]

There are legitmate benefits to globalizaton, but there are drawbacks, but I'd like to have a discussion which include support for an argument with links which people can read if they're interested, not posts which just include links which are others' opinions without any commentary or insight.

It's annoying. I'm not clicking on all that crap. Show some original thought. It's about as bad as somebody posting talking points which pass as original thought.

What about About American integration? What's the status of NAFTA? I'm not going to have a conversation with internet links. Give me some original thought don't just post links; I don't come here to have conversation with links.

Having a conversation with original thought, backed up by some proof--great, but nobody's going to read this crap without some legitimate, analytical thought.

 

[geauxboy]

There are legitmate benefits to globalizaton, but there are drawbacks, but I'd like to have a discussion which include support for an argument with links which people can read if they're interested, not posts which just include links which are others' opinions without any commentary or insight.

It's annoying. I'm not clicking on all that crap. Show some original thought. It's about as bad as somebody posting talking points which pass as original thought.

What about About American integration? What's the status of NAFTA? I'm not going to have a conversation with internet links. Give me some original thought don't just post links; I don't come here to have conversation with links.

Having a conversation with original thought, backed up by some proof--great, but nobody's going to read this crap without some legitimate, analytical thought.

I use this one sparingly, but I felt this to be one of those times. *pwnd*

 

[Rickboy]

Having a conversation with original thought, backed up by some proof--great, but nobody's going to read this crap without some legitimate, analytical thought.

My VERY first time to ever use it..

 

[Reddoctober]

There are legitmate benefits to globalizaton, but there are drawbacks, but I'd like to have a discussion which include support for an argument with links which people can read if they're interested, not posts which just include links which are others' opinions without any commentary or insight.

It's annoying. I'm not clicking on all that crap. Show some original thought. It's about as bad as somebody posting talking points which pass as original thought.

What about About American integration? What's the status of NAFTA? I'm not going to have a conversation with internet links. Give me some original thought don't just post links; I don't come here to have conversation with links.

Having a conversation with original thought, backed up by some proof--great, but nobody's going to read this crap without some legitimate, analytical thought.

fair enough,


lets start with mark weitzman and the H.r. 1955 can you tell me how mentioning richard gage's website


this one:

http://www.ae911truth.org/


explaining his expert analysis of the collapse of 3 buildings on 9-11-01 deserves to mentioned among the ranks of "extremist" websites designed to nurture terrorists?

now i have watched this whole video 3 times 2 months ago.....

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...499&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


and have not found anything materials that call for electronic jihad.

now you are welcomed to sift through it at your leisure to point that segment out to me if i may have missed it, but be warned that might actually require you watching it.



i have not maded up my mind either way on the subject but since that video zeitgiest has been floating around i have noticed several suspicious aspects of my government that had not been known to me before, and i don't think that this guy has the right to censor harmless material, do you?





http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...109&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7

 

[1yearOlder]

What about the international super highway between canada and mexico

Some official in Canada was talking about it like it was happening, people just laughed if someone mentioned it in America. We shall see what happens I suppose.

It is already under construction in Texas , pointing north .
Do you suppose it will just dead end when it reaches Oklahoma ?
In addition , a law passed recently allows Mexican trucking companies to cross the boarder unimpeded .

 

[RebSaint]

fair enough,


lets start with mark weitzman and the H.r. 1955 can you tell me how mentioning richard gage's website


this one:

http://www.ae911truth.org/


explaining his expert analysis of the collapse of 3 buildings on 9-11-01 deserves to mentioned among the ranks of "extremist" websites designed to nurture terrorists?

now i have watched this whole video 3 times 2 months ago.....

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...499&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


and have not found anything materials that call for electronic jihad.

now you are welcomed to sift through it at your leisure to point that segment out to me if i may have missed it, but be warned that might actually require you watching it.



i have not maded up my mind either way on the subject but since that video zeitgiest has been floating around i have noticed several suspicious aspects of my government that had not been known to me before, and i don't think that this guy has the right to censor harmless material, do you?





http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...109&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7

This post represents no analytical thought whatsoever, just a claim. I don't see much original thought. But it's better than the stuff you've put out thusfar.

:Lets start with mark weitzman and the H.r. 1955 can you tell me how mentioning richard gage's website.

--What is this website argue? Who is Mark Weitzman? and what is H.R. 1955? I assume ithe latter is House Resolutoin 1955. Your letting other websites/people make up your mind. Explain to me what these people and websites claim without any links.

I still have no idea what your point is again; 9-11 an inside job? What's your point, again, I have no earthly idea and nobody else probably does either.

If you have a point, the peanut gallery would like to know what it is.

 

[peytonknows]

fair enough,


lets start with mark weitzman and the H.r. 1955 can you tell me how mentioning richard gage's website


this one:

http://www.ae911truth.org/


explaining his expert analysis of the collapse of 3 buildings on 9-11-01 deserves to mentioned among the ranks of "extremist" websites designed to nurture terrorists?

now i have watched this whole video 3 times 2 months ago.....

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...499&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


and have not found anything materials that call for electronic jihad.

now you are welcomed to sift through it at your leisure to point that segment out to me if i may have missed it, but be warned that might actually require you watching it.



i have not maded up my mind either way on the subject but since that video zeitgiest has been floating around i have noticed several suspicious aspects of my government that had not been known to me before, and i don't think that this guy has the right to censor harmless material, do you?





http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...109&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7

You're doing the same exact thing.

 

[geauxboy]

Isn't there some aeroport that allows foreign planes to land without custom checks? Kansas, I believe.

 

[RebSaint]

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hksil-KkebQ&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hksil-KkebQ&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>