Official Wrasslin' Thread (renamed to reflect the discussion) (34 Viewers)

Previous Next
I agree with Torgo, the Hangman/Danielson match was great but as soon as it ended I thought why do the same ending they did with Omega/Danielson. I get they are building to keep this going till Revolution.
 
whodatbe said:
I agree with Torgo, the Hangman/Danielson match was great but as soon as it ended I thought why do the same ending they did with Omega/Danielson. I get they are building to keep this going till Revolution.
Click to expand...
Which is fair.

As I explained last night, I fall into the category of liking it and thinking it helped tell a story (set up in the build).

But I can certainly see both sides. I was certainly expecting a Hangman victory.

The only thing I would push back on is if someone didn’t care for the ending but said “it’s a WWE finish”.
 
So Sammy breaks up with his fiance and social media attacks Tay Conti. Wtf is wrong with people?
 
Grandadmiral said:
So Sammy breaks up with his fiance and social media attacks Tay Conti. What the Fork! is wrong with people?
Click to expand...
Apparently there was a video with the two of them that people are using as some kind of evidence that something was going on between the two of them so they're blaming her for Sammy breaking up with his fiance.
 
Scorpius the Allfather said:
Apparently there was a video with the two of them that people are using as some kind of evidence that something was going on between the two of them so they're blaming her for Sammy breaking up with his fiance.
Click to expand...
Isn't she married?
 
People get deep into these parasocial relationships and think they actually know the people they're following and are invested in their lives. It's not a new phenomenon per se (was first observed in the 50's or 60's with people and actors and TV stars) but social media has kicked it into overdrive. It's pretty pathetic.
 
Sun Wukong said:
People get deep into these parasocial relationships and think they actually know the people they're following and are invested in their lives. It's not a new phenomenon per se (was first observed in the 50's or 60's with people and actors and TV stars) but social media has kicked it into overdrive. It's pretty pathetic.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's almost as if they trade one life for another by vicariously through whoever they follow. And I think leads to some being catfished by people pretending to be those famous people. Pathetic indeed.
 
DaveXA said:
Yeah, it's almost as if they trade one life for another by vicariously through whoever they follow. And I think leads to some being catfished by people pretending to be those famous people. Pathetic indeed.
Click to expand...
The Rollins attacker comes to mind
 
At a certain point, if you're a famous person, I think you have to question if having a major social media presence is benefitting you in any way. It seems like in most cases it just causes headaches and drama for the ones that are really active on it. A lot just turn their accounts over to a handler purely for promotional purposes. The ones that actually personally use it and engage with fans always seem to be dealing with some nonsense because of it.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Register

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Previous Next

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 34 (members: 0, guests: 34)

    Share this page

     

    Twitter

    Back
    Top Bottom