Offline
Comp. | Att | Pctg. | TD | INT | Yards/Att | Passer Rating | |
Player A | 6 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 9.2 | 46.6 |
Player B | 8 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 0 | 11.9 | 146.9 |
Who's up for a challenge? Honor system, please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Comp. | Att | Pctg. | TD | INT | Yards/Att | Passer Rating | |
Player A | 6 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 9.2 | 46.6 |
Player B | 8 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 0 | 11.9 | 146.9 |
Att | Pct. | TD | INT | Yards/Att | Passer Rating | |
Hekker | 22 | 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 8.4 | 82.4 |
Rush Y/A | Rec Y/A | Ctch % | Yrds/Tch | TD% | Fumbles | |
Player A | 5.5 | 10.8 | 75.9 | 6.9 | 10.47 | 1 |
Player B | 4.3 | 7.6 | 71.9 | 4.9 | 4.27 | 30 |
Player 2 is LaDanian Tomlinson
Stats out of context are 100% useless
Here's the exact same players (Guess Player A is a HOF shoe-in):
Rush Y/A Rec Y/A Ctch % Yrds/Tch TD% Fumbles Player A 5.5 10.8 75.9 6.9 10.47 1 Player B 4.3 7.6 71.9 4.9 4.27 30
I’m not sure your OP allows you to talk **** about other posters’ statistical prowessUnlike mine, your comparison has wildly different sample sizes. This is how someone who doesn't understand statistics would attempt to rebut my OP. It was a good try though, keep it up tiger!