Opponents poking holes in Sants screen game - Holder (1 Viewer)

ELLIASJWILLIAMS

More than 15K posts served!
VIP Contributor
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
17,081
Reaction score
30,424
Offline
Really good article by Holder for your reading pleasure early in the AM.


"I mean, I'd say we probably haven't attempted a ton of them, maybe not like historically like we have," Brees said. "Maybe our numbers are down just a little bit in that regard, but numbers are up in other places, so I think it just comes and goes. But, obviously, every week we have called them. It's just a matter if you find the right opportunities to call them."

Brees' answer smells of political correctness. Dance around the issue and throw no one under the bus.
"I think there's just been a couple of miscommunications on what screen maybe it was or some defenses are just reading it," Ingram said. "The D-linemen aren't rushing up the field, and they're diagnosing it. I think (it's) kind of a situational thing as well. Make sure you don't run it on second-and-long or third-and-long when defenses could know it's coming.

"But first of all, we have to execute it as players. After that, you need the right situation to call it. It seems like we haven't done either well."
6. Discouraging stat of the week

The Saints' pass rush is one of the worst in the league in terms of sack totals. Shocking, I'm sure.

New Orleans has only tallied nine sacks during its six games. It ties the Saints with the Giants and the Raiders for 28th in the league. Only the Steelers and the Chiefs rank worse with eight sacks each.

Opponents poking holes in Saints' screen game, plus other First-and-10 tidbits | NOLA.com
 

LombardiGras

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Dec 24, 2013
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
4,326
Offline
Pierre Thomas was the best I have ever seen at running the screen. With PT gone I don't think the screen pass in the Saints offense will ever be as effective as it was.
 

jarrod74

I may be canadian but my heart is in the Big Easy
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Feb 27, 2002
Messages
1,540
Reaction score
1,371
Age
45
Location
Canada
Offline
Pierre Thomas was the best I have ever seen at running the screen. With PT gone I don't think the screen pass in the Saints offense will ever be as effective as it was.
I think Lasco would be good at them if he had more opportunities
 

Consiglieri

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
4,604
Reaction score
5,156
Offline
This has been the case since the latter half of 2013. It got to the point where it seemed every pass was to Graham or a screen. Now we don't have Graham and we don't have a screen game because everybody has planned for it.
 

bobad

Son of Adam
VIP Contributor
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
24,991
Reaction score
17,769
Location
Saints Country
Offline
Screens need setting up. They work when the pass rush is heavy, but Drew gets the ball out so quick it slows down the pass rush.

Also, we're in that empty backfield set a lot, and screens are easier to sniff out.

When a RB is in the backfield, the defense knows there is a high probability it will be a screen. That's why screens work better if you have a fair to good running game.
 

DaveXA

I love the Lord!
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Sep 6, 2001
Messages
33,120
Reaction score
20,884
Age
49
Location
Vienna, VA via Lafayette
Offline
Pierre Thomas was the best I have ever seen at running the screen. With PT gone I don't think the screen pass in the Saints offense will ever be as effective as it was.
Our OL isn't the same as well. I think this contributes as much to is as who's in the backfield. That said, PT was no doubt amazing with screens.
 

Joshwa

Veteran Starter
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
775
Reaction score
1,399
Offline
I wish I had videos to show y'all but back in he day when we ran screens our o-line had a way of throwing the defensive line out of the way. I remember Jahri Evans was really good at it and now the defenders stick to them while they're trying to disengage.

Our offense is strong enough to make up for it in other areas now, but I miss the 2009/2011 run game more then the screen game. We haven't run a game to 0:00 in the fourth in a long time and I think that has more importance then a one read pass play.
 

bclemms

More than 15K posts served!
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
33,205
Reaction score
43,010
Age
13
Location
Jackson, ms
Offline
PT had several things that made him perfect for a screen.
1) The way he casually slipped out for the screen at the last second.
2) He caught the ball smooth and tucked it quickly with his shoulders and hips headed up field.
3) Great vision and patience.
4) almost always made the first person miss.

Ingram does/has none of those.

Cadet is much smoother but teams know he's not going to run the ball and rarely lines up in the backfield so its a red flag when he runs the screen.

Hightower is probably best suited unless Lasco can get worked in the offense more.

A guy that reminds me a lot of PT and is a free agent is Roy Helu. He would be great for that role except we have 5 RB's on the roster.
 

LoE

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
4,677
Reaction score
4,278
Location
North Carolina
Offline
Pierre Thomas was the best I have ever seen at running the screen. With PT gone I don't think the screen pass in the Saints offense will ever be as effective as it was.
True. He was so good at it that, over the seasons, the defense started to expect it when he came on the field.
 

Winter

Pro-Bowler
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
2,948
Location
Santa Cruz, Ca
Offline
Tied for 28th in sacks?

YES!!!!!!!

We aren't last!!!!
true, but look at the teams near our ranking. Most of the defenses in the bottom half of sack totals are run stopping defenses. We are a passing defense. Which is why we don't invest in linebackers as much as secondary and pass rush. If our defense was executing as planned, we should be in the top 10 in sacks, not the bottom 5.
 

Javon7143

InYourFace
Joined
Apr 27, 2002
Messages
2,619
Reaction score
2,877
Age
35
Location
Fairfax, Va
Offline
What Ingram said.
I've been able to pre-diagnose the screen coming EVERY SINGLE TIME for the past 2 years.
 
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
12,776
Reaction score
20,270
Online
I think Lasco would be good at them if he had more opportunities
All I can do is shake my head. How can you make that statement other than by incredibly wishful thinking. PT is the best screen receiver I have ever seen. Faulk and Bush were better pure receivers...but neither were as good as PT at screens.

People on this forum have a heck of a time wrapping their heads around just how good Bush, PT, and Sproles were as receivers. Yes, Brees and guys like Jahri and Nicks help...but they were all elite receivers. Saints fans have been spoiled, and just assume that the next legendary receiving RB is right around the corner. Well, in all likelihood it's not. We could go another couple decades before finding someone like that again. It's not fair to EXPECT that out of guys like Ingram and Lasco. It's just not realistic.
 

xardoz

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Messages
2,097
Reaction score
1,048
Offline
PT was a loss for the screen game, but the biggest loss was perhaps Jon Stinchcomb in 2011.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)



Headlines

Top Bottom