Pff analysis grades on some (1 Viewer)

ELLIASJWILLIAMS

More than 15K posts served!
VIP Contributor
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
17,084
Reaction score
30,427
Offline
"much of the second half featured Oakland taking advantage of the Saints’ inexperience behind him, notably rookies DeVante Harris and Ken Crawley, who played 60 and 47 snaps, respectively. The two combined for five missed tackles and allowed a catch on 10 of 12 targets,"
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-raiders-saints-grades/
Harris I can kind of understand. Before coming here he'd never played the slot and he went from UDFA to starting Nickel which is one of the hardest positions to play on D. He's also of smaller frame so missed tackles may be a recurring issue BUT he was usually in the vicinity.

Crawley just missed horrible tackles and couldn't make a play on any single ball along with giving up ridiculous cushions which accentuated his inability to come up and tackle.

Yet Ive been low on Crawley ever since the 2nd pre-season game when he started doing this odd crouching tiger stuff b4 the snap like he knew what he was doing only to watch the balls be completed in front of him and he missed tackles then. The next week Harris moved in front of him in the pecking order.

Not saying he won't get better and develop but he's clearly our 5th best CB no better but he was the top backup to Breaux so you had no choice.
 

BoNcHiE

Every team's Elixor
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
57,007
Reaction score
69,819
Offline
The plan going in was obviously not to let those guys get that many snaps.

Injuries forced our hand. Now we get a week to gameplan around that.
 

ELLIASJWILLIAMS

More than 15K posts served!
VIP Contributor
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
17,084
Reaction score
30,427
Offline
Also to note our WR crew should be a tough matchup every week.

One would almost forget the two PI calls that Cooks/Thomas Drew at separate intervals of the game which could be legit tacked on to their already crazy #'s between the trio.
 

LoE

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
4,309
Location
North Carolina
Offline
Injuries were the root cause of that loss.

I'm not just talking about Breaux. I'm talking about the cumulative effect on the defense - Kikaha, Rankins, Ellerbe, Breaux, Pruitt, Swann, Wilson.
 

SaintJ

hard, pipe-hittin'
Approved Blogger
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
26,111
Reaction score
20,587
Offline
Crawley, bless his heart, is clearly the weak link back there. Here's a hustling UDFA with a lot to learn who should be on the practice squad, and he's matched up against guys like Crabtree one-on-one.

Having said that, he still looked better getting beat than White or Peterson. The defense as a whole looked a lot better than last year, with more guys in the right position play after play.
 

Eman5805

Soulful Voice Actor
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
27,854
Reaction score
28,249
Location
West Bank
Offline
All of our young bucks have seen action save for Bell, whose time is coming, I'm sure. Especially now that without having the luxury of Breaux being someone you can have in single coverage, which lets us keep an extra guy in the box, we might go to fewer single high coverages.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)



Headlines

Top Bottom