Pilots report "guy in a jet pack" at 3K feet above LAX (1 Viewer)

superchuck500

guarding the potatoes
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Diamond VIP Contributor
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
57,133
Reaction score
86,144
Location
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Online
Sticky Post
Two separate cabin crews reported seeing a “guy in a jet pack” flying near their planes over the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

On Sunday afternoon, a pilot of an American Airlines plane told the LAX control tower that they had seen someone flying near the aircraft in a jet pack, as they attempted to land the plane at the airport, according to tapes obtained by Fox 11. After receiving the report from the American Airlines cabin crew, the control tower warned other pilots to look out for the person when approaching the airport.

The American Airlines pilot claimed that the jet pack was flying at the same height of the plane, at around 3000ft, which was later confirmed by a pilot from a JetBlue flight, who also reported the incident.


The pilot of the American Airlines flight was recorded saying: “We just passed a guy in a jet pack,” as the JetBlue pilot said they saw a “guy passing by them in a jet pack.”



 

DaveXA

I love the Lord!
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Sep 6, 2001
Messages
33,076
Reaction score
20,860
Age
49
Location
Vienna, VA via Lafayette
Offline
The airspace over LAX is not 'restricted' unless your aircraft lacks the equipment required.
You may be thinking about a "controlled" airspace. LAX is a Class B controlled airspace.
True, it's difficult for VFR traffic to navigate in such a busy & regimented airspace, but it is not impossible. So I don't think he'd be illegal if he has a com radio & an altitude encoding transponder required to fly in a Class B airspace. However, he probably doesn't have an airworthiness certificate for whatever equipment he is using to fly around up there. That said, if he has received an airworthiness certificate for his experimental 'jet pack' and has not been signed off to fly outside of the designated test area, then he would be in violation of flying anywhere outside of the distance limitation imposed. :scratch:
I'm frequently in and out of DC so I'm probably getting the restricted airspace in my head because of that. Different animal than airspace over airports. Appreciate the correction. :9:
 

Bill

Still Leaking Gold
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jan 22, 2000
Messages
42,372
Reaction score
32,626
Offline
I'm frequently in and out of DC so I'm probably getting the restricted airspace in my head because of that. Different animal than airspace over airports. Appreciate the correction. :9:
Yes, there are several areas around the country where flying anything overhead is restricted, and DC certainly has a lot of them, especially after 9/11.
Still, I get the feeling that 'jet pack dude' doesn't have what's needed to be buzzing over LAX anyway. This means that someone is going to find out (if they don't already know) the place where his flights are originating and this guy will be getting a visit from the feds real soon.
 

Charlie Brizzown

Good grief
VIP Contributor
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
4,126
Reaction score
5,782
Location
San Diego, CA
Offline
Yes, there are several areas around the country where flying anything overhead is restricted, and DC certainly has a lot of them, especially after 9/11.
Still, I get the feeling that 'jet pack dude' doesn't have what's needed to be buzzing over LAX anyway. This means that someone is going to find out (if they don't already know) the place where his flights are originating and this guy will be getting a visit from the feds real soon.
Good luck visiting him on his alien spacecraft.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Similar threads



Headlines

Top Bottom