- Joined
- Sep 1, 1997
- Messages
- 12,300
- Reaction score
- 3,748
Offline
Romo, and Roy Williams should NOT have gotten in. Romo has not played enough to earn a spot. Honestly I think McNAbb should have been named and then Romo picked to sub for him.
Umm, please clarify this statement please.
McNabb started 10 games (played in about 9.5 of those). Romo started 8 games, played on 10 games (played in about 8.5 out of that 10) of those.
Is there some type of magical cutoff between 8.5 games and 9.5 games? If you want to argue the merit of Romo vs. McNabb based on importance to team, stats, or whatever...good deal. But how can you say Romo has not played enough, when McNabb has played about the same?
Last edited: