Report: Raiders haven’t given Derek Carr permission to seek trade (1 Viewer)

No2DC

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
12,633
Reaction score
21,915
Offline
Not if I'm signing him. 3 years. I don't know how you know what kind of contract he's going to demand.
That sounds nice but we can't afford to pay him 30-35 per year straight up. You must make it 4-5 years to deal with the cap.
 

Rouxble

Pro-Bowler
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
2,634
Offline
We aren’t in position to draft a franchise QB this year. We need a 2-3 year bridge QB. If you want to roll out at 36-39 year old Andy Dalton, we can do that. I think Carr on a three year deal makes more sense.
Anybody but Dalton. In his last ten games, he gave us 190 yards and 1.1 TD’s per game. We got 192 and 1.4 in our last ten games of 2021 with Hill, Book, and Siemian.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
2,032
Reaction score
4,233
Age
43
Location
Mandeville
Online
With our cap situation? Rather than take a shot on a QB in the draft? To me you go after Carr if you think he’s the missing piece to a Super Bowl. Imo he’s not. We aren’t close, and won’t be after losing players this off-season due to cap issues.
I am of the opinion if you make that move, you also draft Hendon Hooker in rd 2. I'm not confident the Saints will land him but they have to make an effort. You keep plugging away until you get your guy.
 

JackDiesel

SR is my life!
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
15,342
Reaction score
17,907
Age
35
Location
Lafayette, LA
Offline
I wholeheartedly agree about taking a risk. With our cap situation that risk needs to be taken thru the draft imo. Cheap contracts. Tired of kicking the can down the road. That window is closed, time to start a new one.

That's what us fans think. That's not what Loomis and Allen believe. And Allen's sitting on a somewhat hot seat. No way he puts his job in the hands of a rookie QB.

We were competitive in a lot of games. Just let down by our offense/QB. It's not inconceivable that we can improve. Carmichael called a few good drives, maybe with an actual QB he can call some good games. He could have had the right plays called last year but they required a contested throw our QB wouldn't attempt. If we get a late first round pick we could also get us a much needed RB. Maybe Allen learned his lesson about being a lil birch and gets more aggressive next year. A lot of maybes but this team still has talent.
 

Saintcd

Rookie
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
1,140
Reaction score
2,330
Age
53
Offline
And if it were to happen, and we devoted a huge salary to him and he turns out to be no better than he performed this year.......
What would all the people saying he's that great have to say then?
Saying " at least they tried to get somebody unlike the last 4 seasons of sitting on their hands", but you still need to keep looking for a qb after his 1st season if he doesn't do well and do everything possible to keep acquiring draft pics for ammo. Use him as a bridge qb.
 

No2DC

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
12,633
Reaction score
21,915
Offline
With our cap situation? Rather than take a shot on a QB in the draft? To me you go after Carr if you think he’s the missing piece to a Super Bowl. Imo he’s not. We aren’t close, and won’t be after losing players this off-season due to cap issues.
Our current coach probably thinks he's the missing piece to his job.
 

Saint Spud

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Mar 6, 2002
Messages
13,942
Reaction score
35,215
Age
43
Offline
That sounds nice but we can't afford to pay him 30-35 per year straight up. You must make it 4-5 years to deal with the cap.
I think you can both be right.

3 year deal with 1-2 void years to spread out the cap. If he’s great, we restructure and pay him great QB money. If he’s not, hopefully you’ve got a QB on a rookie deal to smooth out the hit on the void years.
 

Rouxble

Pro-Bowler
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
2,634
Offline
We were competitive in a lot of games. Just let down by our offense/QB. It's not inconceivable that we can improve. Carmichael called a few good drives, maybe with an actual QB he can call some good games. He could have had the right plays called last year but they required a contested throw our QB wouldn't attempt.
I agree about plays called versus throws made, I know PC gets bashed for running an offense that was 4-yard curls only, I think it was more we had a QB who leaned towards throwing 4-yard curls.
 

nakadish

Guest
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
1,220
Reaction score
3,085
Offline
We aren’t in position to draft a franchise QB this year. We need a 2-3 year bridge QB. If you want to roll out at 36-39 year old Andy Dalton, we can do that. I think Carr on a three year deal makes more sense.

I can see that, though I think Carr gets a better offer elsewhere if that's what the Saints are offering. But, I'm kinda tired of Band-Aids. I'd rather just rip off the Band-Aid and go with a young QB and spend the money elsewhere till we find the right QB. If you're going to get meh QB play, I don't want to spend $30 million a year for it.

The thing that the Saints have to weigh is they could win with Carr. They could get to the playoffs and maybe win a playoff game. But, that's about as far as Carr is going to take them unless the defense is a lockdown defense.

If they want to find an elite QB, they will have to find one in the draft. But, there's no guarantee that they will find one even if they are drafting in the top 10. So, if you have an opportunity to get a guy like Carr it's kinda hard to refuse to pull the trigger even though it's probably better to pass on him. If my job were on the line like DA's is, I'd make every effort to get Carr and he would make or break my career.
 

Saint Greg

SR is my life!
Platinum VIP Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2000
Messages
22,007
Reaction score
25,390
Location
USA
Offline
I can see that, though I think Carr gets a better offer elsewhere if that's what the Saints are offering. But, I'm kinda tired of Band-Aids. I'd rather just rip off the Band-Aid and go with a young QB and spend the money elsewhere till we find the right QB. If you're going to get meh QB play, I don't want to spend $30 million a year for it.

The thing that the Saints have to weigh is they could win with Carr. They could get to the playoffs and maybe win a playoff game. But, that's about as far as Carr is going to take them unless the defense is a lockdown defense.

If they want to find an elite QB, they will have to find one in the draft. But, there's no guarantee that they will find one even if they are drafting in the top 10. So, if you have an opportunity to get a guy like Carr it's kinda hard to refuse to pull the trigger even though it's probably better to pass on him. If my job were on the line like DA's is, I'd make every effort to get Carr and he would make or break my career.

We don’t have a first round pick. This team is not going to draft a 2nd or 3rd round QB and start him as a rookie. You can want it all you want, it’s not going to happen. Unless we make a move for Lamar Jackson, we’re probably looking at Carr or Dalton.
 

onanygivensunday

Pro-Bowler
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
1,980
Reaction score
1,915
Age
74
Location
Seattle
Offline
His 2024 and 2025 dead money won't be escalated forward into a single year. If, rather when, he is cut, the Raiders will have dead money on their books for 2023, 2024, and 2025 from Carr's contract. The only way that dead money will total $5.625m is if he is a post-June 1 cut.
No, I think that you have that wrong.

When a player is cut, there are only two options re dead money... (1) pre-June 1st cut requires all dead money (remaining prorated signing bonus amounts) goes against that year's cap, or (2) designating the cut as post-June 1st, which allows the dead money to be split over this year and next year.

There is no case that I know of where there is dead money for cutting a player that extends to year 3 or beyond. It all comes due in the first year (pre-June 1st cut) or is split between year 1 and year 2 (again, for a post June 1st cut, whether designated or not).

In Carr's case, if he is a pre-June 1st cut, his dead money will be $5.625M... and it will all go against the Raiders 2023 cap. After this year, he is totally off the books for the Raiders.
 

BreesusSaves

MAAAARK INGRAM
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
7,399
Reaction score
18,726
Location
Louisiana
Offline
No, I think that you have that wrong.

When a player is cut, there are only two options re dead money... (1) pre-June 1st cut requires all dead money (remaining prorated signing bonus amounts) goes against that year's cap, or (2) designating the cut as post-June 1st, which allows the dead money to be split over this year and next year.

There is no case that I know of where there is dead money for cutting a player that extends to year 3 or beyond. It all comes due in the first year (pre-June 1st cut) or is split between year 1 and year 2 (again, for a post June 1st cut, whether designated or not).

In Carr's case, if he is a pre-June 1st cut, his dead money will be $5.625M... and it will all go against the Raiders 2023 cap. After this year, he is totally off the books for the Raiders.

We'll see. Either way I think we both agree that Carr is going to be cut Feb 15th.
 

saint_drago

I Must Break You
VIP Contributor
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Messages
11,493
Reaction score
28,192
Location
West Monroe
Offline
I can see that, though I think Carr gets a better offer elsewhere if that's what the Saints are offering. But, I'm kinda tired of Band-Aids. I'd rather just rip off the Band-Aid and go with a young QB and spend the money elsewhere till we find the right QB. If you're going to get meh QB play, I don't want to spend $30 million a year for it.

The thing that the Saints have to weigh is they could win with Carr. They could get to the playoffs and maybe win a playoff game. But, that's about as far as Carr is going to take them unless the defense is a lockdown defense.

If they want to find an elite QB, they will have to find one in the draft. But, there's no guarantee that they will find one even if they are drafting in the top 10. So, if you have an opportunity to get a guy like Carr it's kinda hard to refuse to pull the trigger even though it's probably better to pass on him. If my job were on the line like DA's is, I'd make every effort to get Carr and he would make or break my career.
This is a great point. A lot of fans want to be good enough to win a Super Bowl or bad enough to get a high draft pick to find the future at QB. But for the coaches and front office, this is their actual livelihoods we're talking about. They can't throw their hands up and say to hell with it and start some random rookie QB they drafted. They have to try to win to justify their job. Especially Dennis Allen. So of course he's going to want a vet QB who might not be great shakes but he's the best he can do for now. If I'm DA I'm thinking bring in Carr, try to reach 10 wins and make a run at the division to keep my job.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom