- Joined
- Oct 2, 2016
- Messages
- 6,557
- Reaction score
- 12,269
Online
No, Khalil Mack for the number one pick.Why would the Bengals want Mitch Trubisky straight up for the #1 overall pick in the draft?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No, Khalil Mack for the number one pick.Why would the Bengals want Mitch Trubisky straight up for the #1 overall pick in the draft?
But that's not what I was responding to. The poster I quoted in my response suggesting trading Trubisky, not Mack.No, Khalil Mack for the number one pick.
But that's not what I was responding to. The poster I quoted in my response suggesting trading Trubisky, not Mack.
Mack is 28. What's a better time to listen to trade offers? I believe it's 28.
I thought there was no June first designation this year? Or is that next year?If the Bears trade Mack before June 1st they would have to eat $30.8M in dead money in 2020, which doesn't make sense to me.
I absolutely took it as a joke. If it was in seriousness, dude should never opine on draft trades.FL - I think the #1 for Turbisky was a joke. If not, it needs to be
If Turbisky is worth the #1, I'm worth a 4th - lol
The thing is the Bears haven't had a True Franchise Qb since Sid Luckman. Even if they do get the number 1 pick from the Bengals they will mess up somehow.Been telling ya'll... Franchise QB outweighs all other positions in the NFL... even an All-World DE is up for grabs if it gives you an opportunity to take a chance on what you believe is a Franchise QB... That's just were thee NFL is now.
You either have a Franchise QB.... or you are terrible / mediocre and are desperately looking for one.
If they were to get the #1 pick, it'd have to be by giving Mack to the Bengals, presumably, (with a huge dead cap hit) so they'd likely draft Young to replace Mack and still be stuck with Trubisky.The thing is the Bears haven't had a True Franchise Qb since Sid Luckman. Even if they do get the number 1 pick from the Bengals they will mess up somehow.
I believe it's next year because the current CBA is through the 2020 NFL year, which ends early in 2021.I thought there was no June first designation this year? Or is that next year?
That makes sense. I could have sworn someone said it was this year but I most likely was mistaken. I feel like I remember them saying that there was no June 1 designation because this is the last year of the current CBA though. Oh well. I'm gonna hit the googles.I believe it's next year because the current CBA is through the 2020 NFL year, which ends early in 2021.